Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Sullivan Family Foundation

Disburse from time to time all or part of the fund or funds of the corporation or income to or for qualified donees

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Allergy CanadaC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$818k · 7 repeat orgsC$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

C$818k
C$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+10%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The University of Western Ontario
    4× · 2017–2023 · C$563k · revenue +29%
  • CO
    Camp Ooch
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$8k · revenue +19%
  • DG
    DAVID GOODMAN YOUTH COMMUNITY TRUST
    2× · 2019–2023 · C$7k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CS
    Crescent Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue +51%
  • TP
    True Patriot Love Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$25k · revenue +9%
  • CT
    Coast to Coast Against Cancer Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childhood Cancer Canada Foundation/ Fondation Canadienne Du Cancer Chez L'enfant

Funded and promoted pediatric cancer research initiatives and clinical trials. provided scholarships to childhood survivors. provided financial support to bereaved families to help cover the costs of the final arrangements for their child.…

—
2
The Leonard Dokis Foundation

It awarded scholarships

—
3
The Mindfuel Foundation

1. Tech Futures Challenge (TFC) is a project-based and student driven youth innovation program for middle high-school and postsecondary students delivered through extra-curricular enrichment learning. TFC Operates under MindFuel’s Canada…

—
4
Prostate Cancer Canada

Prostate Cancer Canada has continued to responsibly invest the generous donations of Canadians to develop the most promising studies and minds Canada has to offer in the field of prostate cancer research. We have continued to ensure the…

—
5
Wts Canadian Education Foundation

Wts canadian education foundation grants scholarships to high-potential students enrolled in post-secondary programs relating to transportation

—
6
The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

SickKids Foundation has been inspiring our communities since 1972 to invest in improving the lives of children and their families. Donor support is a critical source of funding for the Hospital for Sick Children and in recent years has…

—
7
Kids Cancer Care Foundation of Alberta

Each year in Alberta about 240 children are diagnosed with cancer. What follows are months or years of invasive treatments that interrupt the normal course of childhood depriving kids of regular childhood experiences such as playdates…

—
8
The Stratas Foundation

Distributed (2) scholarships and/or private research grants to Canadian students and/or scholars at accredited universities or research centers in Canada. Each award was allocated toward a mental health research program intended to advance…

—
9
Telus Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation Telus Pour un Futur Meilleur

To make gifts to qualified donees in support of their charitable work addressing social and economic challenges faced by youth in canada by providing health education and technology programs helping youth reach their full potential. to…

—
10
Team Finn Foundation

The team finn foundation is focused on advancing cancer research with an emphasis on childhood cancer research. we also concentrate on spearheading or helping to advance opportunities to improve the lives of children and families in…

—
11
Sofina Foundation

The foundation supports programs run by qualified donees in the areas of various children's causes.

—
12
Toronto Educational Opportunity Fund

The organization administers a nutritional education program in certain schools throughout the school year. the organization also contributes to the toronto foundation for student success which administers similar programs in schools.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childhood Cancer Canada Foundation / Fondation canadienne du cancer chez l'enfant. and the most unlike its peers is The Crescent School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe University of Western Ontario — C$563,332 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCrescent School — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNext Canada — C$49,999 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetChildhood Now — C$46,700 over 3y, 17% of budgetTrue Patriot Love Foundation — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCoast to Coast Against Cancer Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlzheimer Society — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetParachute — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLoran Scholars Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCamp Ooch — C$7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID GOODMAN YOUTH COMMUNITY TRUST — C$7,314 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThird World Awareness — C$6,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetFood Allergy Canada — C$4,962 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFood Allergy Canada — C$4,694 over 1y, 50% of budgetSanctuary — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMerry Go Round Children's Foundation — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toronto FoundationJewish Foundation of …Cannonbury FoundationConam Charitable Foun…Charitable Gift Funds…Jewish Community Foun…Aqueduct FoundationPrivate Giving Founda…Raymond James Canada …Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…United Way of Greater…Charities Aid Foundat…
Toronto FoundationON10.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Cannonbury Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Aqueduct Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Charities Aid Foundation Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 801042201:2024-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sullivan Family’s filings →