North York, ON · Private foundation
The Sturm Family Foundation
Donating funds to charitable organizations that include religious schools hospitals and medical research
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT BETH AVRAHAM | C$54,000 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$50,000 |
| NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL | C$20,000 |
| MACHZIKAI HADATH CONGREGATION - CLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUE | C$10,000 |
| EMUNAH CANADA | C$5,400 |
| THE JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF CANADA INC. | C$1,800 |
| MIZRACHI CANADA | C$1,800 |
| OR CHAIM MINYAN | C$1,350 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$77k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BABNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS3× · 2018–2022 · C$251k · revenue +94%
- MHMACHZIKAI HADATH CONGREGATION - CLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUE5× · 2017–2023 · C$23k · revenue +274%
- MCMIZRACHI CANADA3× · 2017–2023 · C$18k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT BETH AVRAHAMone grant, 2021 · C$25k
- JNJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDone grant, 2018 · C$10k
- NFNEEMAN FOUNDATION CANADAone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.
The charity provides scholarship to needy students
Support of jewish education and institutions
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
To provide scholarship and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses at yeshiva toldos aharon for the furtherance of religious study
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is J.F. of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT BETH AVRAHAM ↗
- Who funds J F OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds BETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MACHZIKAI HADATH CONGREGATION - CLANTON PARK SYNAGOGUE ↗
- Who funds NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIZRACHI CANADA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds EMUNAH CANADA ↗
- Who funds OR CHAIM MINYAN ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF CANADA INC. ↗
- Who funds NEEMAN FOUNDATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CHEDER ↗
- Who funds YU TORAH MITZION BEIT MEDRASH OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds JACS ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of Yeshiva University ↗
- Who funds TORAH IN MOTION ↗
- Who funds Zichron Binyamin Charity Foundation ↗
- Who funds SSCM ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
- Who funds Gemilas Chesed of Clanton Park ↗
- Who funds CHEVRA OSEH CHESED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds AGUDAS YISRAEL OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds IDF Widows and Orphans Canada ↗
- Who funds REGESH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MEOROTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: My Charity Fund · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Weitz Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Messorah Tzedakah Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Tom and Annie Kohn Charitable Foundation · The Amayn Charitable Foundation · The Robert and Renee Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · The Kelman Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.