Skip to content
Canadian charities

Lachine, QC · Private foundation

The Stephen Kaplan Family Foundation

The proceeds of donaions received are distributed to benefit other charities and scholarships

C$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$90k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$155k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$150k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CJA FOUNDATIONC$90,000
CAMP MASSADC$65,000
FONDATION LA CLÉC$5,000
STARLIGHT FOUNDATIONC$5,000
FONDATION MAIMONIDEC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$600k · 8 repeat orgsC$222k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

C$600k
C$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$165k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JG
    JEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$238k · revenue +31%
  • WC
    WEIZMAN CANADA
    2× · 2019–2021 · C$100k · revenue +17%
  • MC
    MTL CANCER INSTITUTE
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$95k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE YM-YWHA
    one grant, 2019 · C$18k · revenue +3%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k · revenue -20%
  • SA
    SYLVAN ADAMS YM-YWHAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k · revenue +101%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
2
Fondation De L'hopital Mont Sinai / Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation

Providing funds for medical charitable and educational purposes by making gifts grants contributions and donations to or for the benefit of the mont sinai hospital centre montreal

—
3
La Fondation De L'ecole De Formation Hebraique

Raising funds for jewish education in the west island of montreal

—
4
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
5
La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation

The montreal children's hospital foundation is devoted to raising funds for health care research and teaching activities for children and pregnant women primarily for the benefit of the mcgill university health centre and qualified donees.

—
6
Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation

La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…

—
7
La fondation de l'institut thoracique de Montréal / the Montréal Chest Institute Foundation

Make grants directed to the care and treatment of respiratory diseases at the mcgill university health centre

—
8
Israel Cancer Research Fund (Toronto)

The israel cancer research fund (toronto) provides funds to aid in the research of cancer in all phases: causes detection diagnosis treatment cure and care.

—
9
Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Medecine Research Fund

Medical research and education in medicine in canada.

—
10
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
11
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
12
La Fondation De L'hÔPital GÉNÉRal De MontrÉAl the MontrÉAl General Hospital Foundation

Distribute funds to the benefit of the montreal general hospital mcgill university health centre and affiliated entities of mcgill university academic health centre and other organizations of the quebec health network for equipment…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Segal Centre for Performing Arts / Centre Segal des Arts de la Scène. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$237,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWEIZMAN CANADA — C$100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWEST ISLAND CANCER WELNESS CENTER — C$100,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMTL CANCER INSTITUTE — C$95,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCAMP MASSAD — C$65,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMCGILL — C$35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND — C$19,800 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE YM-YWHA — C$18,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYLVAN ADAMS YM-YWHA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$9,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTARLIGHT FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION LA CLÉ — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCentre Segal — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN AND COLITIS CANADA — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morris and Rosalind G…Jewish Community Foun…Mitzi & Mel Dobrin Fa…Fondation Familiale G…The Azrieli Foundatio…The Robin and Evie Fo…The Irving Ludmer Fou…Nellie Philanthropy F…The Henry and Berenic…Alvin Segal Family Fo…Maxwell Cummings Fami…The Mireille and Murr…
Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind GoodmanQC11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Mitzi & Mel Dobrin Family Foundation · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · The Robin and Evie Foundation/La Fondation Robin et Evie · The Irving Ludmer Foundation / la Fondation Irving Ludmer · Nellie Philanthropy Foundation · The Henry and Berenice Kaufmann Foundation · Alvin Segal Family Foundation · Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 894504869:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Stephen Kaplan Family’s filings →