Toronto, ON · Public foundation
The St. Volodymyr Foundation
To support the st.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k9 grants · C$16k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST. VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL OF TORONTO | C$44,000 |
| ST. VOLODYNMYR INSTITUTE | C$20,000 |
| UKRAINIAN MUSEUM OF CANADA OF THE UKRAINIAN WOMEN'S ASSN | C$4,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. ANNE TORONTO | C$3,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. MARY | C$2,500 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. GEORGE ST. CATHARINES | C$1,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST OSHAWA | C$1,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF HOLY TRINITY LONDON | C$1,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHDOX CHURCH OF ST. GEORGE GRIMSBY | C$1,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. ANDREW THE APOSTLE | C$1,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST. DEMETRIUS | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SVST. VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL OF TORONTO8× · 2017–2024 · C$318k · revenue +16%
- UOUkrainian Orthodox Church of St. Anne, Toronto8× · 2017–2024 · C$73k · revenue ×37 · 48% of their budget
- SVST. VOLODYNMYR INSTITUTE8× · 2017–2024 · C$34k · revenue +105%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Weekly services, ministries for parishoners, pastoral care, catechism teaching, cultural programs, celebrate feast days, conduct weddings and funeral services. place of worship, parish
Place of worship with regular church services; Liturgies, Weddings, Baptisms, Funerals. Maintenance of Ukrainian heritage, language and cultural traditions; promotion of cultural activities, counseling for the sick, elderly and troubled…
Continue to provide regular church services to promote and carry on the traditions of the ukrainian catholic faith. services are also provided for marriages funerals and baptisms.
Religious services, seniors' and youth activities, social events, youth and adult education.
Regular church services
Hosting church seminars picnics concerts and events relative to ukrainian heritage. st. volodymyr centre organized the collection and distribution of essential supplies to ukrainian refugees as well as a weekly food bank distribution site…
Hold worship services. provide ministries for adults and youths. provide pastoral care. check on the elderly. provide transportation for the elderly and sick to medical centres. provide soup for the soup
Worship services on sundays and holy days plus funerals baptisms marriages and other religious services
Congregational mass -dispensing sacraments -sunday liturgy -hospital visits -special services -cementary visitation
Religious worship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Volodymyr Cathedral of Toronto and the most unlike its peers is St Vladimir Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST. VOLODYMYR CATHEDRAL OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Anne, Toronto ↗
- Who funds ST. VOLODYNMYR INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM OF CANADA OF THE UKRAINIAN WOMEN'S ASSN ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Andrew the Apostle ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Demetrius ↗
- Who funds St. Vladimir's Ukrainian Orthodox Cathedral of Windsor ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (Toronto) Inc. ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Temerty Foundation · Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · Franko Family Foundation · The Kalimin Foundation · Sus Foundation of Canada · Bcu Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.