Peterborough, ON · Charitable organization
Society of Saint Vincent de Paul (Peterborough)
The store accept donations primary of clothing but also a limited amount of furniture toys household articles etc.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KAWARTHA FOOD SHARE | C$18,000 |
| PROVINCIAL/NATIONAL COUNCILS | C$12,020 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PCPROVINCIAL/NATIONAL COUNCILS4× · 2018–2021 · C$77k · revenue ×14 · 82% of their budget
- KFKawartha Food Share5× · 2017–2021 · C$76k · revenue +52%
- POPARISH OF LAKEFIELD2× · 2019–2020 · C$24k · revenue -26%
Funded once
- SAST. ALPHONSUS REFUGEE GROUPone grant, 2019 · C$18k
- KPKAWARTHA PINE RIDGE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$200 · revenue +173%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.