Skip to content
Canadian charities

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

The Soberano Charitable Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to charitable organizations that are also registered charities under the Income Tax (Act) Canada

C$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,800
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANIC$8,000
PETAH TIKVA ANSHE CASTILLA CONGREGATIONC$5,787
CANADA HELPSC$5,000
DANIC$5,000
UNITED HATZALAH CANADAC$2,784
PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATIONC$2,500
PETAH TIKVA ANSHE CASTILLA CONGREGATIONC$1,800
DANIC$1,800
PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATIONC$1,800
DANIC$1,800
DANIC$1,800
DANIC$1,800
ONE FAMILY FUNDC$500
BAYCREST FOUNDATIONC$360
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$183
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$149k · 15 repeat orgsC$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

C$149k
C$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DANI CENTRE
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$71k · revenue +78%
  • PT
    Petah Tikva Anshe Castilla Congregation
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$33k · revenue +19%
  • CH
    CANADA HELPS
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$7k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • TC
    TORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -52%
  • PQ
    Prime Quadrant Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +464%
  • AA
    Aubrey and Marla Dan Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Israel Cancer Research Fund (Toronto)

The israel cancer research fund (toronto) provides funds to aid in the research of cancer in all phases: causes detection diagnosis treatment cure and care.

—
3
Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto

The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…

—
4
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
5
The Chaim Yosef and Chana Zeifman Charitable Trust

Funding other charities

—
6
Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Medecine Research Fund

Medical research and education in medicine in canada.

—
7
Israel Cancer Research Fund Fondation D'israËL Pour La Recherche Sur Le Cancer

To provide funds to aid the cause of cancer research in canada and israel.

—
8
The Dov Zimmerman Z'l Foundation

To make donations to charitable organizations

—
9
Israel Magen Fund of Canada

The mission of the Israel Magen Fund of Canada is to identify and support projects for qualified institutions in Israel and globally that require humanitarian aid medical assistance and physical and mental health care.

—
10
Sinai Health Giving Fund
—
11
The Lynn and Brent Belzberg Foundation

The foundation makes donations to qualified charities. the largest donations in 2024 were to sinai health foundation queen's university united isreal appeal and forest hill jewish centre.

—
12
Mount Sinai Hospital Otolaryngology Research Fund

Support of academic medical research education and health care in canada

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Dani Developing and Nurturing Independence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
15/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDANI CENTRE — C$71,255 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPetah Tikva Anshe Castilla Congregation — C$33,462 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetPRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$11,434 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetProject Aseret — C$7,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCANADA HELPS — C$7,180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$4,630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUJA Federation of Greater Toronto — C$3,644 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HATZALAH CANADA — C$2,784 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJoe Dwek OHR Haemet Sephardic School — C$2,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVE'AHAVTA — C$2,110 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCapitalize for Kids Foundation — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPrime Quadrant Foundation — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAubrey and Marla Dan Foundation — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION OF ONTARIO — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Canadian Zionist Cultural Association — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWe Charity — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSinai Health Foundation — C$900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND — C$860 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$718 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave a Child's Heart — C$525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Shalom Synagogue — C$518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer Society — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish National Fund — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMS SOCIETY — C$360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$286 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND WITH US — C$236 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hospital for Sick Children Foundation — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGEN DAVID SHEPARDIC CONGREGATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNNYBROOK FOUNDATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Foundation of …Conam Charitable Foun…The Dr. Wolf Lebovic …The Joseph Lebovic Ch…Jack and Doris Bistri…United Jewish Appeal …Zichron Binyomin Char…My Charity FundThe Serruya Family Fo…Silver Family Charita…The Weitz Family Foun…Heitner Charitable Fo…
Jewish Foundation of Greater TorontoON12.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Conam Charitable Foundation · The Dr. Wolf Lebovic Charitable Foundation · The Joseph Lebovic Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · United Jewish Appeal of Greater Toronto · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · My Charity Fund · The Serruya Family Foundation · Silver Family Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 827228420:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Soberano’s filings →