Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Laval, QC · Public foundation

The SITN Foundation

C$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$75k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$104k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST ISLAND BLACK COMMUNITYC$50,000
FOND MARIE-ÈVE SAULNIERC$25,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALC$25,000
WOMEN'S SHELTERC$25,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$464k · 4 repeat orgsC$207k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

C$464k
C$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+36%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WEST ISLAND FRIENDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$204k · revenue +64% · 29% of their budget
  • CS
    CURE SMA
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$105k · revenue -3%
  • LC
    LYMPHOME CANADA
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$80k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • MF
    MIRIAM FONDATION
    one grant, 2019 · C$30k · revenue +14%
  • WI
    WEST ISLAND WOMEN SHELTER
    one grant, 2019 · C$30k · revenue -2%
  • SP
    SIMPLE PLAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · C$20k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fondation Santé
—
2
La fondation des jumelles coudé

La fondation recoit et administre des dons dans le but d'aider au financement de projets de recherche. medicale sur la poly neuropathie.

—
3
Fondation Mon Étoile pour le financement de la recherche curative du cancer
—
4
Fondation Dania Kayali

To support research projects initiatives and other foundations to give children and young adults with sarcoma the best chance to heal and fully recover.

—
5
Fondation l'Intermède

La fondation l'intermède a pour mission de soutenir financièrement la maison de répit l'intermède. celle-ci permet aux familles vivant avec un enfant ou un adulte ayant une déficience intellectuelle et/ou un trouble du spectre de l'autisme…

—
6
La Fondation Jean Meloche /the Jean Meloche Foundation

Aide au développement de la relève de diverses disciplines et de centres d'excellence qui visent le soulagement de la souffrance ou de l'incapacité physique ou mentale.

—
7
Fondation Alain Lemaire
—
8
Fondation Guy Bourgeois Contre Le Cancer
—
9
Fondation Maison Simonne-Monet-Chartrand
—
10
Fondation Émergo

Recueillir des fonds pour l'autisme et autres troubles envahissants du développement

—
11
Fondation Laurent Hurtubise

L'objectif est d'aider les jeunes sportifs attients de limitations physiques

—
12
Fondation Maxime-Letendre
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Marie-Ève Saulnier and the most unlike its peers is Maison Le Ricochet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST ISLAND FRIENDS FOR MENTAL HEALTH — C$204,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetCURE SMA — C$105,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetLYMPHOME CANADA — C$80,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITAL — C$75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST ISLAND BLACK COMMUNITY — C$50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMIRIAM FONDATION — C$30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWEST ISLAND WOMEN SHELTER — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER — C$25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFOND MARIE-ÈVE SAULNIER — C$25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSIMPLE PLAN FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetFONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAISON LE RICOCHET — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFONDATION DE LA MAISON DE SOINS PALLIATIFS DE VAUDREUIL-SOUL — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGERDYS RESCUE AND ADOPTION — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSUMMIT SCHOOL FOUNDATION — C$750 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Du Grand Mo…The Tenaquip Foundati…Claudine and Stephen …Jewish Community Foun…La Fondation du Grand…The Azrieli Foundatio…Private Giving Founda…United Way Golden Hor…Charities Aid Foundat…TELUS Friendly Future…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way East Ontar…
Centraide Du Grand MontréalQC10.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Du Grand Montréal · The Tenaquip Foundation / la Fondation Tenaquip · Claudine and Stephen Bronfman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Claudine et Stephen Bronfman · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Private Giving Foundation · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 768040115:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on SITN’s filings →