Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Etobicoke, ON · Public foundation

The Sheptytsky Council No 5079

Donations to qualified donees - religious & cultural pursuits

C$40
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$40
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$40
Median grant
1
Regions reached
—
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS ONTARIO CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONC$40
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$8k · 4 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
18

Total granted

C$8k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-2%

Still filing today

25%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST. JOSEPH'S UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$4k
  • CT
    Christ The Good Shepherd
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$3k
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS ONTARIO CHARIT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$1k · revenue -66%

Funded once

  • HU
    HELP US HELP
    one grant, 2023 · C$5k
  • TS
    THE SHEPTYTSKY COUNCIL NO.5079 CHARITABLE TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +195%
  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CANADIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Josaphat Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
2
St. Joseph's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
3
Ukrainian Catholic Church of St Josaphat

Advancement of religious experience according to the doctrine of the ukrainian catholic faith

—
4
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St John the Baptist

Worship services on sundays and holy days plus funerals baptisms marriages and other religious services

—
5
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St Nicholas
—
6
The Dormition of the Mother of God Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
7
St Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
8
All Saints Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
9
St Michael's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
10
St Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
11
Sts Peter & Paul's Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—
12
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross

Provides ukrainian catholic religious services (worship services weddings funerals baptism first communion etc.)

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Elias Ukrainian Catholic Church and the most unlike its peers is Ivan Franko Homes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChrist The Good Shepherd — C$2,700 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTORONTO RIGHT TO LIFE — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS ONTARIO CHARIT FOUNDATION — C$1,390 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIVAN FRANKO HOME — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoly Dormition Mother of God — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JESUIT SEMINARY ASSOCIATION — C$330 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Tribute Gift Found…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps CanadonPayPal Giving Fund Ca…
My Tribute Gift FoundationON4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 888626793:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sheptytsky Council No 5079’s filings →