Thornhill, ON · Private foundation
The Shello Charitable Foundation
Received income from investments and made gifts to qualified donees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$82k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA | C$48,000 |
| KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH | C$23,000 |
| THE CANADIAN SHAAREI ZEDEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$10,880 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$11k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MOMIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA5× · 2017–2021 · C$173k · revenue +123%
- TBThe Buckingham Charitable Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · C$100k · revenue -75%
- KHKUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH5× · 2017–2021 · C$81k
Funded once
- UIUnited Israel Appeal of Canada Inc.one grant, 2017 · C$18k · revenue -19%
- CFCanadian Friends of Shalva Associationgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$3k · revenue +52%
- GOGates of Mercyone grant, 2018 · C$3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
Support of jewish education and institutions
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students
The foundation donates funds to charitable religious organisations and educational institutions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Israel Appeal of Canada Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Buckingham Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds The Buckingham Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds Beth Oloth Charitable Organization ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds United Israel Appeal of Canada Inc. ↗
- Who funds BAT MELECH CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE CANADIAN SHAAREI ZEDEK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of Shalva Association ↗
- Who funds Gates of Mercy ↗