London, ON · Private foundation
The Scowen Foundation
Committed to funding programs that perpetuate the values and community spirit embraced by Philip and Eulah Scowen throughout their lives with a particular emphasis on marginalized populations improved opportunities for youth promotion of education endowment of the arts and strengthening of local communities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bishop's University | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BUBishop's University2× · 2021–2022 · C$20k · revenue +40%
- SMSANTE MENTALE ESTRIE INC. / MENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE INC.2× · 2018–2020 · C$8k · revenue +637%
- MNMissisquoi North Volunteer Centre4× · 2017–2023 · C$4k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- MFMAB-MCKAY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · C$15k
- MRMassawippi Retirement Communitiesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +34%
- MDMaison Dunham inc. / Dunham House inc.graduatedone grant, 2020 · C$5k · revenue +338%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maintain cemetery burials mow lawns grounds maintenance restore old gravestones.
Location d'immeubles pour personnes handicapées utilisés par le centre de réadaptation en déficience intellectuelle de montérégie-ouest sur une base permanente
L'organisme a pour mission de favoriser le maintien à domicile des adultes vieillissants ou en perte d'autonomie en offrant des services adaptés dans une perspective de prévention pour le maintien et le développement d'habilités…
Cemetery
répit pour personne vivant avec un handicap intellectuel ou physique
Hosptial long term care facility
Le Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux des Îles a pour objet d'exploiter un centre local de services communautaires un centre d'hébergement et de soins de longue durée un centre hospitalier de soins généraux et spécialisés et un…
Foyer de soins pour personnes âgées et à besoins spéciaux
Service d'hébergement pour la réinsertion de personnes éprouvant des difficultés en santé mentale.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre De RÉAdaptation Mab-Mackay Mab-Mackay Rehabilitation Centre and the most unlike its peers is North Hatley Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP MASSAWIPPI- CENTRE MACKAY ↗
- Who funds Bishop's University ↗
- Who funds Massawippi Retirement Communities ↗
- Who funds SANTE MENTALE ESTRIE INC. / MENTAL HEALTH ESTRIE INC. ↗
- Who funds Maison Dunham inc. / Dunham House inc. ↗
- Who funds Missisquoi North Volunteer Centre ↗
- Who funds NORTH HATLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COOKSHIRE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TOWNSHIPPERS RESEARCH AND CULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation de la famille Zeller · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.