Airdrie, AB · Charitable organization
The Saskatoon Lighthouse Foundation Corp.
Develop christian education; relieve poverty in canada and around the world; promote the gospel of jesus christ
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROYAL OAK VICTORY CHURCH | C$600 |
| SASKATOON FOOD BANK INC | C$400 |
| CALGARY INTER-FAITH FOOD BANK SOCIETY | C$400 |
| HER VICTORY SOCIETY CALGARY | C$300 |
| THE CALGARY EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SHELTER | C$250 |
| THE BRIDGE ON 20TH FELLOWSHIP CENTRE INC | C$250 |
| JOURNEY CHURCH | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AFAIRDRIE FOOD BANK4× · 2020–2023 · C$2k · revenue +2%
- TBTHE BRIDGE ON 20TH FELLOWSHIP CENTRE INC2× · 2023–2024 · C$1k · revenue +6%
- TCTHE CALGARY WOMEN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER2× · 2023–2024 · C$500 · revenue +100%
Funded once
- WMWORLD MISSION CONTINUUM SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$600 · revenue +61%
- SISASKATOON INTERVAL HOUSEone grant, 2022 · C$500 · revenue +5%
- CICALGARY INTER-FAITH FOOD BANK SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Supplying food to the needy in inverness area
Providing emergency food to people in need.
Food security for those that need help by provided food and non-perishables. work with local fcssaa to assist families in need.
Feeding the homeless in the community women and children programs
Provide food to families in need
The interlake food bank is open every second thursday in stonewall manitoba.
Place of Worship Weekend food kitchen to feed the homeless and needy Food hampers for those in need in the surrounding community
Distributing food hampers to single persons and families in need.
We are a food bank. We collect and purchase food for distribution to individuals and families within our catchment area.
Food bank meals to homeless and the intercity soup kitchen emergency hamper program.
Food bank nights on tuesday nights - the society hands out food and basic personal care items to in-need community members of jasper alberta emergency hampers and emergency food bundles - throughout each week the society make available…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Calgary Inter-Faith Food Bank Society and the most unlike its peers is Royal Oak Victory Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AIRDRIE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ON 20TH FELLOWSHIP CENTRE INC ↗
- Who funds SASKATOON FOOD BANK & LEARNING CENTRE ↗
- Who funds WORLD MISSION CONTINUUM SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SASKATOON INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CALGARY INTER-FAITH FOOD BANK SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MUSTARD SEED SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE CALGARY WOMEN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds ROYAL OAK VICTORY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds INNISFAIL & AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HER VICTORY SOCIETY CALGARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · Atco Electric Epic · United Way of Calgary and Area · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.