Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The Salamander Foundation
The foundation awards financial grants to qualified donees in the areas of arts and culture and the environment.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$4k
- C$50k–250k9 grants · C$900k
- C$250k+8 grants · C$9.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royal Ontario Museum | C$1,750,000 |
| Toronto Foundation | C$1,610,000 |
| United Way Toronto | C$1,565,000 |
| University of Toronto | C$1,500,000 |
| Library and Archives Canada | C$1,000,000 |
| University of Western ON | C$1,000,000 |
| London Community Foundation | C$750,000 |
| Neptis Foundation | C$500,000 |
| The Royal Conservatory | C$200,000 |
| Evergreen | C$200,000 |
| Environmental Defence | C$100,000 |
| WWF | C$100,000 |
| Tiges Canada Initiatives | C$100,000 |
| CPAWS | C$50,000 |
| Wildlife Conservation Society | C$50,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +90% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7.7M went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Toronto2× · 2017–2018 · C$1.6M · revenue +43%
- LALibrary and Archives Canada2× · 2017–2018 · C$1.0M · revenue +4% · 64% of their budget
- WWWF2× · 2017–2018 · C$165k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- CMCanadian Museum of Historyone grant, 2017 · C$100k
- CMCanadian Museum of Natureone grant, 2017 · C$50k
- DUDucks Unlimited Canadagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$45k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
TRCA works to protect conserve and restore natural resources within its jurisdiction for the benefit of current and future generations. TRCA provides programs and services that support healthy rivers and shorelines sustainable communities…
The David Suzuki Foundation works through science and education to protect the diversity of nature and our quality of life now and for the future.
* to conduct research on climate change environmental protection ecological conservation and preservation environmental science and renewable energy; *to publicize conducted research to the general public to increase understanding of the…
Freshwater conservation canada is committed to conserving protecting and restoring canada's freshwater ecosystems and their coldwater resources for current and future generations. programs and projects are delivered by our professional…
The canadian council on ecological areas (ccea) is a national leader in providing evidence-based guidance in the establishment and management of a comprehensive network of ecological areas to contribute to the conservation and restoration…
Earthroots fund works to promote the protection of canada's wilderness wildlife and watersheds through research and public education
Protecting canada's most endangered ecosystems by acquiring and managing funds to address key funding gaps through: supporting land-embedded communities and qualified donees with grants and facilitating access to other funding sources to…
Cwf’s mission is to conserve and inspire the conservation of canada’s wildlife and habitat for the use and enjoyment of all through research direct programming education and advocacy. cwf is recognized for our leadership in bringing…
Td friends of the environment foundation (tdfef) is a national charity that funds environmental projects across canada. with the support from our donors td fef has provided more than $117 million to over 29 000 environmental projects and…
1. Research to advance the conservation of songbird species at risk in agricultural landscapes; and 2. Research to improve our understanding of the distribution abundance and productivity of songbird species at risk.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nature United/ Nature Unie and the most unlike its peers is Nunavut Arctic College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Royal Ontario Museum ↗
- Who funds Toronto Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Toronto ↗
- Who funds United Way Toronto ↗
- Who funds Library and Archives Canada ↗
- Who funds University of Western ON ↗
- Who funds London Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Neptis Foundation ↗
- Who funds Evergreen ↗
- Who funds The Royal Conservatory ↗
- Who funds WWF ↗
- Who funds Tiges Canada Initiatives ↗
- Who funds Environmental Defence ↗
- Who funds Ottawa Riverkeeper ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds CPAWS ↗
- Who funds Greenbelt Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Canada ↗
- Who funds University of Ottawa ↗
- Who funds Nature Conservancy of Canada ↗
- Who funds TNC Canada ↗
- Who funds Ecojustice ↗
- Who funds International Institute for Sustainable Development ↗
- Who funds Succession ↗
- Who funds Dalhousie University ↗
- Who funds Equiterre ↗
- Who funds Manitoulin Streams Improvement ↗
- Who funds Nunavut Research Institute ↗
- Who funds Nature Canada ↗
- Who funds The Pembina Foundation ↗
- Who funds Philanthropic Foundations Canada ↗
- Who funds Canadian Environment Grantmakers Network ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Écho /Echo Foundation · The McLean Foundation · Makeway Foundation · The George Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation · The Sitka Foundation · The Trottier Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Trottier · The J W McConnell Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille J W McConnell · Ivey Foundation · The Chawkers foundation · Td Friends of the Environment Foundation · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · The Consecon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.