How much did The Ryf Charitable Trust grant in FY2024?

The Ryf Charitable Trust reported 27 grants totaling C$253,216 in its FY2024 T3010 return.

Where is The Ryf Charitable Trust based?

The Ryf Charitable Trust is based in TORONTO, ON.

The Ryf Charitable Trust

Canadian charities Also receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Ryf Charitable Trust

The charity provided funds to 'qualified donees' as defined in the income tax act.

C$253k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

—

Regions reached

C$186k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under C$10k25 grants · C$43k
C$10k–50k1 grant · C$24k
C$50k–250k1 grant · C$186k

C$1,572

Median grant

—

Regions reached

C$507k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA	C$186,264
YESHIVAS KESSER TORAH	C$24,000
KOLLEL TORONTO	C$5,100
NER YISROEL YESHIVA	C$5,000
TOMCHEI SHABBOS	C$3,500
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER	C$3,000
BAIS YAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL	C$3,000
MIRER YESHIVA	C$2,500
YESHIVAS NACHLAS TZVI	C$1,800
THE TORONTO CHEDER	C$1,800
BIKUR CHOLIM	C$1,800
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA	C$1,800
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL	C$1,800
MEOROTH	C$1,572
MOSDOS BOBOV	C$1,050

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$1.1M). The 17% that went abroad (C$226k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$226k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

C$1.1M · 38 repeat orgsC$234k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

C$1.1M

C$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+8%

Still filing today

84%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

JH
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
4× · 2020–2024 · C$509k · revenue +68%
KT
KOLLEL TORONTO
3× · 2020–2024 · C$110k · revenue +14%
YK
YESHIVAS KESSER TORAH
5× · 2019–2024 · C$60k · revenue +28%

Funded once

PA
PER ATTACHED LIST
one grant, 2021 · C$137k
JH
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · C$44k
BY
BAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL
one grant, 2022 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—

Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—

Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—

Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—

Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—

Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—

Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—

The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—

Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—

Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Torah Schools for Israel and the most unlike its peers is Technology Awareness Group Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

48/53

Grantees still filing

32/53

Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable FoundationON26.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Play a game based on Ryf’s filings →