Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Hamilton, ON · Private foundation

The Ronald K. Fraser Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part thereof and/or all of the income therefrom for educationalor other charitable purposes

C$96k
Granted FY2018
7
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$14k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$13,781
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hamilton Health Sciences FoundationC$13,781
Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board FoundationC$13,781
Dr Bob Kemp Centre for HospiceC$13,781
The Mohawk College FoundationC$13,781
The Childrens Aid Society of HamiltonC$13,781
Good ShepherdC$13,781
Hamilton Community FoundationC$13,781
02Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHamilton Community Foundation — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGood Shepherd — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mohawk College Foundation — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Childrens Aid Society of Hamilton — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHamilton Health Sciences Foundation — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHamilton-Wentworth District School Board Foundation — C$13,781 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDr Bob Kemp Centre for Hospice — C$13,781 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Golden Hor…Hamilton Community Fo…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…BenefAction FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…Charitable Gift Funds…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way Golden HorseshoeON8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Golden Horseshoe · Hamilton Community Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · BenefAction Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Source object 119252831:2018-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ronald K. Fraser’s filings →