Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Val Gagne, ON · Charitable organization

The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Timmins

Lieu de culte; suivi de deuil; visites aux malades; prépararions aux sacrements de baptême réconciliation eucharistie confirmation mariage funérailles; ministres extraordinaires de la communion (visites pour donné à la maison pour les aînés et les malades.

C$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$271k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAROISSE ST. DOMINIQUEC$10,000
PAROISSE ST. JOSEPHC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$162k · 9 repeat orgsC$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
8

Total granted

C$162k
C$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
-2%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    Diocese of Timmins
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$62k · revenue +908% · 54% of their budget
  • PL
    Project Love c/o Mountjoy United Church
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$29k · revenue +65%
  • AC
    ANTI-HUNGER COALITION
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$10k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TL
    The Lord's kitchen
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k
  • FB
    Food Bank Timmins
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -2%
  • TS
    The Salvation Armygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +462%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vicariate of Eastern Canada

Supporting civil food banks & faimly support (not by the church) relief to poor and homeless admin. for churches and missions

—
2
Fraternity Poor of Jesus Christ Inc.

Supporting and maintaining missions and missionaries to expand catholic faith providing and supporting homeless with food

—
3
Mission Food Bank

We provide food and clothing for those less fortunate. (90%)

—
4
The Community Pantry

Supply of food to persons in crisis situation

—
5
The Lord's Food Bank Rocky Mountain House Society

Food choice pantry meal kitchen little red pantries.

—
6
The Simcoe Caring Cupboard

Collection and disribution of food to the needy

—
7
Good Samaritan Food Bank Inc
—
8
For 'the Least of These' Ministry

Relieve poverty by providing basic amenities as food clothing helathcare and financial aid to the poor in mexico moldova and philippines

—
9
Partners in Mission Food Bank

Operates a food bank and supports hot meal programs in the kingston area

—
10
St. Thomas Elgin Food Bank

Operation of food bank for people in need

—
11
Society of Saint Vincent De Paul - Hope Cottage

Provide meals to poor and homeless

—
12
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Timmins Food Bank a division of St. Martin de Porres Charities and the most unlike its peers is Mountjoy United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDiocese of Timmins — C$62,026 over 5y, 54% of budgetProject Love c/o Mountjoy United Church — C$28,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetANTI-HUNGER COALITION — C$10,425 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFood Bank Timmins — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTH PORCUPINE FOOD BANK — C$8,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetThe Salvation Army — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetSAVE-A-FAMILY PLAN — C$2,460 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCostello Community Care Centre — C$2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHOLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION — C$1,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LORD'S KITCHEN SOCIETY INC — C$577 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC MISSIONS IN CANADA — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Marcel and France…Ontario Power Generat…Vancouver FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…My Tribute Gift Found…United Way East Ontar…Charitable Gift Funds…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
The Marcel and Frances Labelle FoundationON10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Marcel and Frances Labelle Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Vancouver Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 130599442:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Timmins’ filings →