Gander, NL · Charitable organization
The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls
Operates three churches and organizes all matters related to the operation of the parish .
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k19 grants · C$78k
- C$10k–50k13 grants · C$252k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORP. OF GRAND FALLS | C$35,579 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$35,276 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$30,911 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$21,911 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$21,213 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$17,978 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$16,333 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$14,379 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$12,698 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$12,232 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLS | C$11,661 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$11,536 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$10,555 |
| Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Falls | C$9,861 |
| RC Episcopal Corp of Grand Falls | C$8,905 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$31k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RCROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORP. OF GRAND FALLS8× · 2017–2024 · C$2.8M · revenue -23% · 50% of their budget
- SVST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY8× · 2017–2024 · C$47k · revenue +49% · 52% of their budget
- HCHOLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIAITON6× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue -23%
Funded once
- RCRoman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Grand Fallsone grant, 2017 · C$13k
- RCROMAN CATHOLIC EPISCOPAL CORPORATION OF GRAND FALLSone grant, 2017 · C$7k
- LKLionel Kelland Housegraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue +163%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.