Millarville, AB · Private foundation
The Rising Light Foundation
The primary goal and purpose of the foundation is to create manage and build endowment funds for charitable organizations and other charities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMPOWER MINISTRIES | C$30,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +172% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EMEmpower Ministries8× · 2017–2024 · C$952k · revenue +172%
- JCJustice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms2× · 2017–2018 · C$18k · revenue +365%
- SESoul edge3× · 2017–2020 · C$6k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- CCCanadian Centre for Home Educationone grant, 2018 · C$6k · revenue -48%
- GBGATEWAY BIBLE CHURCHone grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +23%
- TCTrinity Christian School Associationone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Worship services training in the scriptures religious doctrines & disciplines counselling services; relief to the needy education programs prayer ministry & service children's & youth programs orphanage support.
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Christian education
Missionary training -bible studies
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Religious education
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Conduct gospel outreaches provide study materials for educational discipleship prayer and bible teaching
To promote Christian Education world-wide in order to help make disciples of Jesus Christ and to educate the church in North America about cultures by creating opportunities for them to interact to actively participate in meeting people's…
Publishing missionary organizations evangelism social outreach religious fellowship
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Centre for Home Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Empower Ministries ↗
- Who funds Full Gospel Church of Calgary ↗
- Who funds Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms ↗
- Who funds Soul edge ↗
- Who funds Canadian Centre for Home Education ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY BIBLE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Trinity Christian School Association ↗
- Who funds HARVEST BIBLE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds EQUIP INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY GROUP ↗
- Who funds BIBLES FOR THE POOR SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.