Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

The Rev. Marian and Dr. Roman Curkowskyj Foundation

Support research study writing and development

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$166k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN ANDREY SHEPTYTSKY INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONC$5,000
UKRAINIAN WORLD CONGRESS FOUNDATIONC$2,000
CANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATIONC$1,130
ST DEMETRIUS CHURCHC$1,000
ST JOHN THE THEOLOGIANC$500
WWF-CANADAC$327
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$102
ST NICOLAS UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC CHURCHC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 4 repeat orgsC$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -48% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

C$14k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-48%

Still filing today

75%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$13k · revenue -80%
  • CU
    CANADA UKRAINIAN FOUNDATIONM
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$700 · revenue +129%
  • SV
    ST VOLODYMYR CATHETHEDRAL
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$300 · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • UC
    UKRAINIAN CANADIAN REAEARCH & DOCUMENTATION CENTRE
    one grant, 2023 · C$600 · revenue +19%
  • SS
    SHEVENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · C$500
  • SE
    ST ELIAS UKRANIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · C$500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Canadian Foundation for Ukrainian Studies

Promoting ukrainian education in canada. the foundation adminsters various funds which promote scholarly studies publications and conferences through grants fellowships and awards

—
2
Canada's National Ukrainian Festival Inc.

Operates annual festival promoting art and culture of ukrainian people

—
3
The Ukrainian Catholic Foundation of Canada Inc.
—
4
Ukrainian Cultural and Educational Foundation Inc
—
5
Ukrainian Catholic Parish of St Nicholas
—
6
St Michael's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
7
Ucrainica Research Institute

The Institute concentrates on research publishing. The Institute implements an extensive education program by sponsoring the 'Literature and Arts' page in the community newspaper 'Ukrainian Echo;' promoting lectures by distinguished…

—
8
St. Joseph's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
9
St Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church
—
10
Wolodymyr George Danyliw Foundation

Funding for research seminars on contemporary ukraine

—
11
Ukrainian Museum of Canada of the Ukrainian Women's Association of Canada

The charity operates and maintains a museum of ukrainian cultural artifacts historical books and clothing.

—
12
Sts Peter & Paul's Ukrainian Catholic Parish
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Cancer Society - SociÉTÉ Canadienne Du Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/15
Grantees still filing
4/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CANADA-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — C$13,347 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ANDREY SHEPTYTSKY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUKRAINIAN WORLD CONGRESS FOUNDATION — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADA UKRAINIAN FOUNDATIONM — C$700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUKRAINIAN CANADIAN REAEARCH & DOCUMENTATION CENTRE — C$600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHEVCHENKO SCIENTIFIC SOCIETY — C$500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWWF-CANADA — C$327 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VOLODYMYR CATHETHEDRAL — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN STUDIES FOUNDATION — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VALEDYLOV CATHEDRAL — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Temerty FoundationUkrainian Canadian Fo…Ihnatowycz Family Fou…Zak FoundationBcu FoundationCanada GivesBenefAction FoundationStrategic Charitable …CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…
Temerty FoundationON12.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Temerty Foundation · Ukrainian Canadian Foundation of Taras Shevchenko · Ihnatowycz Family Foundation · Zak Foundation · Bcu Foundation · Canada Gives · BenefAction Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 888307063:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rev. Marian and Dr. Roman Curkowskyj’s filings →