Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Randy Gillies Family Foundation

The organization uses its funds in order to support qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act (canada) with their endeavors.

C$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$10,250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF FUNDC$10,250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$978k · 5 repeat orgsC$121k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +138% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

C$978k
C$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$836k · revenue +138%
  • NS
    NATIONAL SKI ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$36k · revenue +54%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$36k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • OB
    OUTWARD BOUND CANADA
    one grant, 2017 · C$40k · revenue +25%
  • GH
    G&M HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · C$40k · revenue -9%
  • PC
    PANCREATIC CANCER CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
2
North York General Hospital Foundation

North york general hospital foundation raises and stewards funds for north york general hospital to purhase medical and capital improvements and support the hospital program and staff training and education. with the foundation's funding…

—
3
Bc Cancer Foundation

The bc cancer foundation is the fundraising partner of bc cancer and the largest charitable funder of cancer research in this province. we enable donors to make contributions to leading-edge research that has a direct impact on…

—
4
Canadian Sport Foundation Fondation canadienne de sport

We deepen public understanding of a selection of intellectual topics in sport and educate the public about them.

—
5
The Ottawa Hospital Foundation

The ottawa hospital foundation raises and grants funds to the ottawa hospital foundation and the ottawa hospital research institute and other qaulified donees for the purposes of improving patient care capital dvelopment medical research…

—
6
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
7
Bluewater Health Foundation

Bluewater Health Foundation raises funds for the hospital group known as Bluewater Health. These funds are spent on capital projects and to facilitate the acquisition of leading edge equipment and technology and the provision of programs…

—
8
William Osler Health System Foundation

William Osler Health System Foundation (Osler Foundation) provides funding to William Osler Health System (Osler) a leading hospital system serving more than 1.3 million people in Brampton North Etobicoke Caledon and surrounding…

—
9
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—
10
Paralympic Foundation of Canada

The Paralympic Foundation of Canada's (the 'Foundation') mission is together deliver the best prepared teams for games excellence while promoting inclusive communities through the power of sport and its ambition is to raise $35 Million by…

—
11
North Bay Regional Health Centre Foundation

Primary goal is to provide funds for patient-focused care education and research for the benefit of the patients of Nipissing region of Northeastern Ontario. Encourage and administer donations to enhance and improve the services to the…

—
12
Cancer Care Ontario

Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) is the provincial government agency responsible for driving health system performance improvement for Ontario's cancer and chronic kidney disease health systems. CCO also supports achievement of Ontario's Wait…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Olympic Foundation/ Fondation Olympique Canadienne and the most unlike its peers is The University of Western Ontario. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLONDON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION — C$836,100 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetOUTWARD BOUND CANADA — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetG&M HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL SKI ACADEMY — C$36,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO — C$36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER CANADA — C$10,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF FUND — C$10,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGEORGIAN BAY GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN OLYMPIC FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSICK KIDS FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toronto FoundationON7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Jackman Foundation · BenefAction Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Raymond James Canada Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · The Calgary Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 855378683:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Randy Gillies Family’s filings →