Skip to content

Scotsburn, NS · Charitable organization

The Parish of Northumberland

Conduct services in four communities.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$540
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$972k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAN INTERNATIONALC$540
MISSION TO SEAFARERS-HALIFAXC$500
OXFORD & AREA FOOOD BANKC$200
PWRDFC$120
CUMBERLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$50
TERRY FOX FOUNDATIONC$40
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$9k · 8 repeat orgsC$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

C$9k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+28%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    PLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +13%
  • MT
    MISSION TO SEAFARERS-HALIFAX
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$545 · revenue +64%
  • OA
    OXFORD & AREA FOOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$500 · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AD
    Anglican Diocese of Nova Scotia and PEIgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k · revenue +61%
  • PO
    PARISH OF AMHERST
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue -43%
  • OA
    OXFORD & AREA FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · C$240

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northumberland Hills Hospital Foundation

Improving health care and the quality of life in the community by growing and maintaining donor support for the northumberland hills hospital

—
2
Northumberland County Foodbanks

Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

—
3
North Shore Health Research Foundation

The charity funded various health care research projects.

—
4
Cumberland Health Care Auxiliary

Opearton of the hospital coffee shoppe at the cumberland regional health care facility.

—
5
Northern Cancer Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to raise funds which are then disbursed to health sciences north (hsn) and health sciences north research institute (hsnri). amounts received from the foundation are used to fund capital research equipment…

—
6
The Northumberland Hills Hospital Auxiliary

Raise funds for the Northumberland Hills Hospital for capital equipment - Provide volunteers to support the Northumberland Hills Hospital in its day-to-day operations

—
7
Cancer Support and Resource Program of Norfolk

Raising money to support local families affected by cancer

—
8
Ed's House Northumberland Hospice Care Centre Foundation

For fundraising to operate and expand the hospice services with ed’s house

—
9
Hants Community Hospital Foundation

The hants community hospital foundation carries on activies to raise funds to assist hants community hospital with capital purchases to provide the means to support community health care for the community of west hants.the foundation…

—
10
Norfolk General Hospital Foundation

Norfolk General Hospital Foundation is a public foundation which receives and maintains funds to use and apply from time to time on all or part of the capital or income therefrom the benefit of Norfolk General Hospital's medical…

—
11
Volunteer Association to Norfolk General Hospital and Norfolk Hospital Nursing Home

The purpose of the volunteer association to norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home is to assist norfolk general hospital and norfolk hospital nursing home in their objectives of giving the best patient and resident care…

—
12
Cumberland County Hospice/Palliative Care Society

Society was founded in 2002. it provides direct support to individuals requiring equipment medications training reference material transportation and nutritional supplements. a current project is the contruction of a 5-7 bed hospice care…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Cumberland Memorial Hospital Auxiliary and the most unlike its peers is The Terry Fox Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAnglican Diocese of Nova Scotia and PEI — C$8,160 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA — C$4,723 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARISH OF AMHERST — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION TO SEAFARERS-HALIFAX — C$545 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOXFORD & AREA FOOOD BANK — C$500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTERRY FOX FOUNDATION — C$320 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH FDN. — C$100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEAST CUMBERLAND LODGE — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCumberland Hospital Foundation — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CUMBERLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUXILLIAR — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDiocesan Times — C$10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wentworth United ChurchNS8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wentworth United Church · BenefAction Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 872965165:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Parish of Northumberland’s filings →