Mississauga, ON · Private foundation
The PAOC Foundation
To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Stouffville Pentecostal Church | C$25,000 |
| Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada | C$24,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPentecostal Assemblies of Canada5× · 2020–2024 · C$260k · revenue +19%
- MCMaster's College and Seminary2× · 2018–2019 · C$11k · revenue -14%
- NCNew Castle Pentecostal Church2× · 2018–2021 · C$8k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- OVOttawa Valley Pentecostal Campgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$30k · revenue +36%
- PAPentecostal Assemblies of Canadagraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$25k · revenue ×23
- ACAurora Cornerstone Churchone grant, 2023 · C$25k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
Sunday school for all ages sunday worship services bible study youth and family events.
Sunday school for all ages sunday am & pm worship services bible study youth and family
Church Services Sunday School Bible Study Children's Ministry Youth Ministry Support of missionaries and evangelism. provide community support
Sunday school for all ages sunday worship services bible study youth and family
Sunday school for all ages sunday am & pm worship services bible study youth and family events christian school.
Preaching Teaching
Church services youth programs children's programs community events women's/men's ministries
Hold weekly worship services hold meetings for spiritual benefit of men and women. ministries for children youth and young adults. provide pastoral care to members and support christian mission.
Church Services Sunday School Bible Studies prayer meetings Youth outreach and activities counseling services community outreach center benevolent programs and support of missionaries
Operating and maintaining a church for spiritual growth and ministering the word of god.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Calvary Pentecostal Church and the most unlike its peers is The Wellspring Foundation for Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada ↗
- Who funds Ottawa Valley Pentecostal Camp ↗
- Who funds Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada ↗
- Who funds Stouffville Pentecostal Church ↗
- Who funds Aurora Cornerstone Church ↗
- Who funds Calvary Pentecostal Church ↗
- Who funds Church in Regent Park ↗
- Who funds Master's College and Seminary ↗
- Who funds New Castle Pentecostal Church ↗
- Who funds Random Access ↗
- Who funds Women Together ↗
- Who funds Lakeshore Pentecostal Camp ↗
- Who funds The Wellspring Foundation for Education ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Eastern Ontario District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.