North York, ON · Public foundation
The Order of Malta (Ontario) Charitable Foundation
To apply and distribute the funds of the foundation for religious charitable or educational purposes
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$30k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARCHDIOCESE OF TORONTO | C$35,000 |
| ROSALIE HALL | C$15,000 |
| PROVIDENCE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| ORDER OF MALTA CANADIAN ASSOCIATION | C$7,000 |
| THE CANADIAN CATHOLIC BIOLOGICAL INSTITUTE | C$5,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD REFUGE SOCIAL MINISTRIES | C$5,000 |
| THE FURNITURE BANK | C$5,000 |
| ST. FRANCIS TABLE | C$5,000 |
| OUT OF THE COLD MIDLAND | C$2,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF TORONTO4× · 2017–2022 · C$140k · revenue ×211 · 26% of their budget
- GSGOOD SHEPHERD REFUGE SOCIAL MINISTRIES4× · 2017–2022 · C$50k · revenue +28%
- RHROSALIE HALL4× · 2017–2022 · C$30k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- OOOut of the Cold - St Patricks Churchgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +392%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide residential outreach and rehabilitation services to children and adults with mental and/or physical disabilities. provide foster care and treatment home services for abused and/or emotionally disturbed children. provide…
Provides the following services to the homeless: overnght shelter transitional supportive housing medical services food clothing furniture. also provides a variety of programs including literacy counselling housing searcjes job searches.…
The organization provides housing for single men and women families and couples. it also provides assistence in finding housing and employment.
House of compassion is a not-for-profit charitable organization that offers a permanent affordable and supportive home to 21 men and women with severe and persistent mental illness. our goal is simple. we walk the journey with each…
Parkdale Activity-Recreation Centre (PARC) is a comprehensive multi-service agency dedicated to addressing a variety of critical issues including poverty mental health addiction homelessness and food security among our members. Our…
Grace Inn Shelter operates a homeless shelter. It helps adults in a safe dignified and hospitable environment by meeting essential needs providing compassionate mentors and advocating for a future with hope. We extend hospitality to our…
Providing affordable accommodation to marginalized families and individuals and providing supports to meet their complex needs.
The organization provides accomodations in a safe and stable environment to individuals in brantford who are homeless. in addition special projects are undertaken as required to meet city requirements. rosewood house inc. operates under…
Fred Victor is a dynamic innovative rapidly growing multi-service non-denominational organization with a 130-year track record of supporting people experiencing homelessness living on very low incomes or struggling with mental health…
Provide overnight emergency shelter and housing to homeless families. provide referrals for counseling and housing as well as providing food and clothing to assist families with obtaining and substaining housing. provide financial and…
The organization provides upport care services and accessible housing to adults with physical and developmental disabilities so that they can live independantly. services include assistance with dressing bathing houskeeping and meal…
Youth without shelter is a 53 bed residence for homeless youth aged 16-24. in addition to shelter and food the following services are provided: mental health counselling life skills training employment services personal clothing and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto in Canada and the most unlike its peers is Rosalie Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARCHDIOCESE OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD REFUGE SOCIAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ROSALIE HALL ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS TABLE ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CATHOLIC BIOETHICS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds The Guesthouse Shelter - Midland Out of the Cold ↗
- Who funds Out of the Cold - St Patricks Church ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Ontario Power Generation Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · BenefAction Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.