Vankleek Hill, ON · Public foundation
The Orange and Protestant Children's Foundation
The charitable organisation dispenses funds collected and acquired to support programs for children.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMISSION SCOLAIRE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS | C$3,000 |
| COMMISSION SCOLAIRE SIR-WILFRID-LAURIER | C$1,800 |
| FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE SECONDAIRE ST-PATRICK | C$1,350 |
| TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH | C$1,200 |
| LA FONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL DE MONTRÉAL POUR ENFANTS | C$1,000 |
| BRAVE HEARTS RIDING CLUB | C$1,000 |
| CHEO FONDATION ROGER NEILSON | C$1,000 |
| MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DU PONTIAC | C$750 |
| CAMP SOLEIL DE MELISSA | C$750 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CSCOMMISSION SCOLAIRE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS6× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +56%
- CFCHEO Fondation7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +114%
- MCMontreal Children's Hospital Foundation7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- LELENNOXVILLE ELEMENTRY SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · C$500
- MDMAISON DE LA FAMILLE DU PONTIACone grant, 2022 · C$500
- SFST FRANCIS ELENMENTRY SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Institution d'enseignement privée pour élèves de niveau secondaire.
Fournir des équipements adaptés participer aux activités sociales de l'école.
La fondation apporte son support financier pour des projets au sein de l'école primaire de normandie (longueuil) tels que l'achat de matériel et d'équipements sportifs le réaménagement de la cour extérieure et des activités pédagogiques.
Organiser des levées de fonds pour acheter des équipements médicaux pour le cisss montérégie-est
Recueillir les fonds pour des fins charitables et promouvoir l'enseignement l'éducation et l'instruction de la clientèle étudiante de l'école saint-michel.
Assure le bien-être des élèves handicapés de l'école le touret et aide à l'amélioration des équipements à leur disposition
École secondaire privée de saint-hyacinthe au niveau secondaire.
La fondation des écoles des bourdons et courval de neuville a pour mandat d'assurer l'avancement de l'éducation en procurant du matériel éducatif et de l'équipement pédagogique aux étudiants de ses écoles.
Promouvoir l'avancement de l'éducation pour l'école charles-perrault (pierrefonds)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le Fonds De L'education Anglaise De Thetford Mines and the most unlike its peers is Trinity Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMISSION SCOLAIRE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS ↗
- Who funds CHEO Fondation ↗
- Who funds Montreal Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION SCOLAIRE SIR-WILFRID-LAURIER ↗
- Who funds Brave Hearts Riding Club ↗
- Who funds TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LE FONDS DE L'ÉDUCATION ANGLAISE DE THETFORD MINES ↗
- Who funds COMPTOIR ST-PIERRE DE FORT-COULONGE INC. ↗
- Who funds CAMP SOLEIL DE MELISSA ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'ÉCOLE SECONDAIRE ST-PATRICK ↗
- Who funds MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DU PONTIAC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DE L'HOPISTAL DE THETFORD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.