Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Oakville, ON · Public foundation

The Oakville Foundation for Intellectually Handicapped People

The foundation continues to provide grants to agencies supporting individuals with special needs in ontario.

C$136k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
1
Regions reached
C$73k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$58k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$73k
C$20,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY LIVING OAKVILLEC$72,500
NEW VISIONS TORONTOC$23,350
HARMONY IN ACTIONC$20,000
L'ARCHE LONDONC$15,000
ONTARIO TRI SKIC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$198k · 3 repeat orgsC$172k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

C$198k
C$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    COMMUNITY LIVING OAKVILLE
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$129k · revenue +52%
  • NV
    NEW VISIONS TORONTO
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$53k · revenue +21%
  • OT
    Ontario Tri Ski
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$15k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • JT
    JVS Toronto
    one grant, 2017 · C$36k · revenue +11%
  • CL
    Community Living St Catherines
    one grant, 2018 · C$20k · revenue +24%
  • LH
    L'Arche Hamiltongraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$18k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Living Toronto

Community Living Toronto provides a variety of innovative supports to children youth and adults with an intellectual disability and their families. Our person-centered services and supports aim to foster natural community networks and…

—
2
Community Living London

Community living london provides a wide variety of supports to adults and children with developmental disabilities. these include: accomodation for adults; job creation and support for individuals in competitive employment; community…

—
3
Vita Community Living Services of Toronto Inc

Vita community living services of toronto provides residential programs in group homes and apartment settings respite programs for adults and youth adult life skills and work experience training for individuals with developmental…

—
4
Community Living Central York

Provide services and support for individuals with developmental disabilities. These services include residential supports supported independent living employment supports and day programming.

—
5
Community Living Cambridge

At Community Living Cambridge we partner with individuals who have developmental disabilities and their community to live fulfilling lives. We do so by operating 26 group homes and apartments through independent living supports in the…

—
6
Community Living Wallaceburg

Community Living Wallaceburg's purpose: We co-create design & deliver supports that empower people to overcome barriers and live the life they choose. Community Living Wallaceburg provides meaningful supports and services to individuals…

—
7
Community Living Windsor

Provide services for people with developmental disabilities - group homes employment supports education advocacy day supports and assistance administering direct funding.

—
8
Community Living-Central Huron

Community living-central huron provides a variety of staffing support to adults & children with a developmental disability. these supports include: 24hr in-home assistance; indepenent living assistance; employment; social & individuals…

—
9
Community Living Hanover and Area Harc Inc.

We assist individuals with developmental disabilities to live and work in the community. we operate residential homes; supported independent living; life skills training; community job placements; and day programming.

—
10
Community Living Kingston and District

1. Operate group homes for intellectually disabled persons. 2. Provide support services for intellectually disabled persons who live independently. 3. Provide employment services for disabled persons. 4. Provide days supports and…

—
11
Community Living Essex County

Community living essex county provides a range of supports and services enabling people with intellectual disability to live in their community. community participation supports includes employment volunteering educational recreational and…

—
12
Community Living - South Huron

The organization is a community organized dedicated to providing support to people with intellectual challenges through education advocacy and innovation. it operates programs and facilities in southwestern ontario including various adult…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Living St. Catharines and the most unlike its peers is Queen's University At Kingston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING OAKVILLE — C$129,452 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEW VISIONS TORONTO — C$53,350 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJVS Toronto — C$36,368 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHARMONY IN ACTION — C$20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCommunity Living St Catherines — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetL'Arche Hamilton — C$18,225 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetL'ARCHE LONDON — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOntario Tri Ski — C$15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCommunity Living Burlington — C$13,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Living Ontario — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetQueen's University — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLuso Can. Charity — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetParticipation Lodge Grey Bruce — C$9,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRosa's Centre — C$7,328 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harry E Foster Charit…The Harold E. Ballard…Toronto FoundationUnited Way Golden Hor…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…United Way of Greater…BenefAction FoundationMy Tribute Gift Found…Charitable Gift Funds…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…
Harry E Foster Charitable FoundationON13.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harry E Foster Charitable Foundation · The Harold E. Ballard Foundation · Toronto Foundation · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · BenefAction Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2019-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2019. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 866757917:2019-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Oakville Foundation for Intellectually Handicapped People’s filings →