North York, ON · Public foundation
The Nexgen Charitable Foundation
Provide relief of poverty by assisting the poor and provide a scholarship fund for needy
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$11k
- C$10k–50k7 grants · C$169k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BNOS CHAYA | C$41,350 |
| MOSDOS BOBOV | C$38,810 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU | C$28,938 |
| MISHKAN HATORAH | C$17,696 |
| YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA | C$17,628 |
| YESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI | C$12,676 |
| BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$11,672 |
| BNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL | C$6,930 |
| FOUNDATION OF TORAH | C$2,000 |
| KAV SHALOM KHM | C$1,575 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$39k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · C$123k · revenue +75%
- BCBNOS CHAYA2× · 2023–2024 · C$62k · revenue +5%
- YGYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU2× · 2023–2024 · C$43k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- KAKOLLEL AVREICHIM/INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIESone grant, 2021 · C$45k · revenue +12%
- KHK H MEOROTHone grant, 2021 · C$44k
- YBYESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTOone grant, 2023 · C$19k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.
Operate a school for teaching religious studies
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders
Support of jewish education and institutions
The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.
The organization operates a religious jewish high school for deaf and hearing impaired students who desire a religious jewish education and who are unable to attend or would have great difficulty attending a conventional religious jewish…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Chevrah Msamchei Lev. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FOUNDATIONS OF TORAH CHARITABLE ORG. ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BNOS CHAYA ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL AVREICHIM/INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU ↗
- Who funds MISHKAN HATORAH ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA B'NEI ZION OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BNAI ZION CHARITY ↗
- Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MESAMCHEI LEV ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds KAV SHALOM KHM ↗