Skip to content

Huntsville, ON · Charitable organization

The Muskoka Spiritualist Church

Psychic fairs bake sale - at fair church on sundays memberships

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA FOOD BANKC$1,000
FOOD FOR KIDS MUSKOKAC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$10k · 4 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +325% since the first grant, against +74% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

C$10k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+325%
+74%

Still filing today

75%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Manna Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +325%
  • SO
    S.P.C.A of Muskoka
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +28%
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    2× · 2017–2020 · C$900 · revenue ×199

Funded once

  • HO
    Hospice of Muskoka (Andy's House)graduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +871%
  • GA
    GRAVENHURST AGAINST PROVERTY
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k
  • HM
    HOSPICE MUSKOKA
    one grant, 2018 · C$750

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Muskoka Food Bank

The west muskoka food bank is a volunteer driven organization with the goal of alleviating hunger in our community.

—
2
Muskoka Victim Services

Assisting police and emergency services to meet the short term needs of victims of crime and tragic circumstances by providing emotional support practical assistance and referrals to community services.

—
3
Muskoka Seniors Home Assistance

MEALS ON WHEELS - Hot meals Frozen Meals Grocery Delivery - Coordinated by Staff delivered by Volunteers SOCIAL CONNECTIONS - Includes weekly social events with guest speakers topics and activities - Coordinated by Staff delivered by…

—
4
Elder Abuse Prevention Muskoka

Education and awareness of elder abuse and providing support for victims of elder abuse.

—
5
Muskoka Family Focus and Children's Place

Youth services

—
6
Muskoka Conservancy

The vision of the organization is to ensure muskoka's natural spaces are protected forever and to conserve nature in muskoka

—
7
Muskoka Womens Advocacy Group

Muskoka womens advocacy group (mwag) is a community organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for women in muskoka. since 1984 mwag has been the sponsoring agency for a number of projects designed to benefit women and their…

—
8
Georgian Bay Food Network

To relieve poverty by providing food and other basic supplies to persons of low income by establishing operating and maintaining a food bank.

—
9
Madawaska Valley Food Bank

Storing and dispensing food in barry's bay ontario to needy families in barry's bay and the surrounding area -seeking and accepting donations of cash and food in kind in barry's bay ontario and the surrounding area -fund-raising in barry's…

—
10
Mudhuskies Animal Shelter

Mudhuskies Animal Shelter purpose is to provide care and shelter for homeless cats and dogs in the Quinte area and encourage adoption of homeless cats and dogs and neutering and spaying of cats and dogs.

—
11
Muskoka Woods Youth Foundation

The mandate of the foundation is to recieve manage and disburse funds to charitable organizations to be used by them for their charitable purposes which include: (1) providing financial assistance to permit needy and disadvantaged youth to…

—
12
Ponoka Food Bank Association

To meet the immediate food needs for men women and children in the ponoka community and area who for reasonable reasons do not have sufficient funds to meet that need themselves

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manna Food Bank of Bracebridge Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Table Soup Kitchen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetManna Food Bank — C$6,600 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHospice of Muskoka (Andy's House) — C$1,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetS.P.C.A of Muskoka — C$1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAVENHURST AGAINST PROVERTY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSalvation Army — C$900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDRENS FOUNDATION OF MUSKOKA — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTABLE SOUP KITCHEN FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSKOKA PARRY SOUND SEXUAL ASSUALT SERVICES — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR KIDS MUSKOKA — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Muskoka Community FoundationON11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Muskoka Community Foundation · The John McConnell and Margaret Ann Wilson McConnell Memorial Foundation · United Way Simcoe Muskoka · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Community Foundations of Canada · Vancouver Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 835121344:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Muskoka Spiritualist Church’s filings →