Skip to content

Morris, MB · Public foundation

The Morris Area Foundation Inc.

The earnings from this fund are used to give grants to a wide range of area groups.

C$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$41k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$22k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$58k
C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN HEALTH DISTRICTC$40,782
RED RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISIONC$17,670
TOWN OF MORRISC$7,850
MORRIS EARLY LEARNING CENTREC$5,000
WILLOW PARK COMMITTEEC$2,500
CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION FOUNDATIONC$2,100
SPERLING COMMUNITY CENTREC$2,000
RED RIVER PALLIATIVE CAREC$1,500
VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARYC$800
MORRIS & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM INCC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$208k · 11 repeat orgsC$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

C$208k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+6%

Still filing today

82%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SOUTHERN HEALTH DISTRICT
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$106k · revenue +24%
  • RR
    RED RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$30k · revenue +25%
  • ME
    MORRIS EARLY LEARNING CENTRE
    3× · 2019–2024 · C$7k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • RR
    RED RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION
    one grant, 2022 · C$4k
  • RM
    RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF MORRIS
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k
  • HT
    HEART TEAM INC
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crane Valley and Districts Recreation Centre Inc.

Provide recreation and social gathering centre for our community. We serve various age groups including seniors and youth.

—
2
Rossbrook House Inc.

Rossbrook house is a safe place for children and youth living in the inner city of winnipeg. it operates a drop in centre offering a variety of sport leisure educational and cultural activities

—
3
Swan Lake Recreation Complex Inc.

Provides sports and recreation programs to the community and surrounding areas through the operation of a hockey and curling rink and sports complex and provides youth training in sports and recreation.

—
4
Ronald McDonald House Manitoba Inc.

Rmhc manitoba supports the health and well-being of children by providing a 'home-away-from-home' and other essential servicces for critically ill chronically ill and seriously injured children and their families

—
5
Prairie North Regional Health Authority

The Regional Health Authority provides comprehensive health services including: acute care, long term care, primary health, home care, community/public health, mental health, addiction services, emergency services and health promotion and…

—
6
Ste. Rose Health Centre Inc.

Ste. Rose Health Centre Inc. delivers acute care and personal care home services in accordance with the guidelines outlined by Manitoba Health and in accordance with the overall mission of the organization.

—
7
Riverhurst Community Hall

Community Hall for the Riverhurst area includes ball diamonds and rodeo corrals

—
8
Ross Memorial Hospital

Ross memorial hospital provides acute healthcare and continuing care services for the benefit of residents of city of kawartha lakes and neighbouring communities.

—
9
Spray Lake Sawmills Recreation Park Society

SLSRPS operates a multi-use recreation facility providing recreation for the public. Amenities include ice arenas curling center aquatic center outdoor spray park climbing wall gymnasium indoor sport court indoor track fitness facility as…

—
10
Morris-Emerson Area Health Foundation Inc.

The charity raises additional funds to promote the health and welfare of citizens of the Red River Valley District. Funds are used for the purchase of supplies, equipment, and services not funded by the Province of Manitoba Health.

—
11
River Valley Community Center Foundation Inc

Operation of an arena and recreational programs for the residents of the lower saint john river valley community.

—
12
Gull Lake & District Recreation Complex Inc.

Community rink and hall complex

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morris United Church and the most unlike its peers is Youth for Christ (Morris). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN HEALTH DISTRICT — C$106,456 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION — C$29,825 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS EARLY LEARNING CENTRE — C$6,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMORRIS & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM — C$6,350 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetROSENORT COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$6,224 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSPERLING COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$3,300 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY MANITOBA — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FOR CHRIST MORRIS INC — C$2,733 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMORRIS UNITED CHURCH — C$2,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S REHABILITATION FOUNDATION — C$2,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART TEAM INC — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRED RIVER PALLIATIVE CARE — C$1,500 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE CROSS — C$750 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHERN HEALTH DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER VALLEY SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS EARLY LEARNING CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS & DISTRICT CENTENNIAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ROSENORT COMMUNITY CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds SPERLING COMMUNITY CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRIST MORRIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS UNITED CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds RED RIVER PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE CROSS ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

All Charities CampaignMB7.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: All Charities Campaign · Community Foundations of Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 880296413:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Morris Area’s filings →