Thornhill, ON · Private foundation
The Milos Raonic Foundation
Gifts made to qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HORATIO ALGER CANADA | C$10,000 |
| HOLLAND BLOORVIEW FOUNDATION | C$5,000 |
| HUMBER RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HBHolland Bloorview7× · 2017–2024 · C$146k · revenue +39%
- TCTENNIS CANADA FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2023 · C$85k · revenue +135%
- HRHUMBER RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · C$25k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- UCUNICEF CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$21k · revenue +45%
- TAThe American Fund for Charitiesone grant, 2018 · C$195
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.