Skip to content

North York, ON · Private foundation

The Meeko Charitable Foundation

Distributing income and capital to other ' qualified donees' within the meaning of the income tax act ( canada) whose objects are confined to charitable purposes and funding and maintaining endowments in support of such objects.

C$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$360
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$45k
C$21,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$278k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATIONC$24,000
BIALIKC$21,000
BAYTC$360
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$833k · 9 repeat orgsC$222k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

C$833k
C$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+14%

Still filing today

89%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • J
    JACS
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$148k · revenue +101%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2022 · C$62k · revenue +68%
  • EC
    EITZ CHAIM
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$53k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHABAD CHAI CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$58k · revenue +35%
  • AI
    ANIYEI IRCHO
    one grant, 2021 · C$40k
  • A
    ASSOCIATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$31k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
3
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
4
Women's Institute of Torah Study

Jewish education for women part-time education for ladies / religious education

—
5
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
6
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—
9
Jems - Jewish Education Matters

Jewish education

—
10
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
11
Torah in Motion

Jewish education on-line and by public lectures and conferences.

—
12
The Interactive Jewish Education Centre

To preach and advance the teachings of the Jewish faith and the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with that faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paths of Torah School and the most unlike its peers is Jacs Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKUPAS HACHESSED MEOROTH — C$438,840 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJACS — C$148,400 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$61,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD CHAI CENTER — C$57,545 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetEITZ CHAIM — C$52,810 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIALIK — C$39,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBNEI AKIVA — C$32,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATED — C$31,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNETIVOT — C$28,280 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING A JEWISH TOMORROW (NCSY) — C$28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABBOS — C$25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINSTITUTE OF TORAH EDUCATION — C$24,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIRYAT HAYELED — C$10,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHORNHILL TORAH EDUCATIONAL CENTRE — C$6,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION PROGRAM — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCFO EDUCATION AND WELFARE OF JEWS OF THE CIS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOV — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION — C$4,135 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOR HAEMET (JOE DWEK) — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH — C$108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rayjo Charitable TrustON13.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · My Charity Fund · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The Joseph Tanenbaum Charitable Foundation · The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation · The Dr. Wolf Lebovic Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Mizrachi Organization Of Canada · J.Frankel Family Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 733917926:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Meeko’s filings →