Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Mazel Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom to registered charities.

C$458k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$275k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$179k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$275k
C$25,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$730k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GITTA NISHUMA FOUNDATIONC$275,000
TIFERES BARS YAAKOVC$49,000
THE SHTIEBELC$36,000
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLSC$31,000
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$25,000
YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAHC$19,800
ADAS ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF HAMILTONC$18,000
RELIEF RESOURCES CANADAC$2,500
INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED TALMUDIC AND HALACHIC STUDIESC$1,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$803k · 6 repeat orgsC$378k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against -45% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

C$803k
C$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-45%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$333k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS
    6× · 2018–2023 · C$311k · revenue +24%
  • TB
    TIFERES BARS YAAKOV
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$203k · revenue +43%
  • YY
    YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$79k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • PO
    PATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · C$35k
  • PO
    PATH OF TORAH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
2
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
3
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
4
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
5
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
6
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
9
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
10
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
11
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
12
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Relief Resources Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$311,417 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GITTA NISHUMA FOUNDATION — C$275,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetTIFERES BARS YAAKOV — C$203,234 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$79,300 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — C$75,600 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$67,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPaths of Torah School — C$66,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE SHTIEBEL — C$36,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetADAS ISRAEL CONGREGATION OF HAMILTON — C$18,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPATH OF TORAH SCHOOL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRELIEF RESOURCES CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED TALMUDIC AND HALACHIC STUDIES — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 862783453:2024-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Mazel’s filings →