Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Marble Arch Foundation Corp.

To distribute income and principal to charitable organisations that are 'qualified donees.'

C$161k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$59k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$35k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$17k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$110k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLSC$58,500
NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOLC$51,000
BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTOC$16,800
BEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOVC$7,542
THE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLELC$4,000
BUILDING A JEWISH TOMORROWC$2,700
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA UNIVERSITYC$2,300
EZER MIZION CANADAC$2,000
MIZRACHI CANADAC$2,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAHC$2,000
MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADAC$1,800
KCCC$1,800
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTOC$1,800
EMUNAH CANADAC$1,800
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$1,300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$563k · 26 repeat orgsC$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
12

Total granted

C$563k
C$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-1%

Still filing today

85%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$180k · revenue +111%
  • BA
    BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$78k · revenue +23%
  • NH
    NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$53k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • BC
    B.A.S CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -527%
  • EA
    EZRAT ACHIM
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue -31%
  • RF
    RMG FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
3
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
4
Jewish Educational Services

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith.

—
5
The Canadian Jewish Educational Fund

The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.

—
6
Yedidut Torah Foundation

The foundation operates programs to promote religious study and foster successful religious outreach.

—
7
Abraham Kahn

The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.

—
8
Torah Schools for Israel

To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…

—
9
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
10
Young Jewish Professionals

Provide classes and seminars to jeiwsh professionals in the areas of jewish religious tenents doctrines and observances

—
11
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
12
Canadian Friends of the Institute 0HOLEI Torah

The charity provides scholarship to needy students

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Futures of Ontario and the most unlike its peers is Dani Developing and Nurturing Independence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/39
Grantees still filing
23/39
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBNEI AKIVA SCHOOLS — C$180,030 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION — C$77,730 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetYU TORAH MITZION BEIT MEDRASH OF TORONTO — C$61,865 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$53,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAISH TORONTO — C$26,180 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEmunah Canada — C$19,901 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBEIT MIDRASH ZICHRON DOV — C$19,100 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$17,330 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA — C$16,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION CANADA — C$12,640 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUDNATION OF CANADA — C$11,710 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING A JEWISH TOMORROW — C$11,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$9,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL — C$7,305 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCZCA CANADA — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDANI — C$5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH LEARNING INITIATIVE ON CAMPUS (JLIC) — C$3,550 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetI.D.F. Windows and Orphans Organization — C$3,300 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRUCHAMA FREIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATION — C$2,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH IN MOTION — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGates of Mercy — C$2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Oloth Charitable Organization — C$2,287 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH YOUTH NETWORK — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute of Torah Education — C$1,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF CUBAN JEWRY — C$1,080 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRMG FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIEN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHR CANADA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Somayach Toronto — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKETER TORAH — C$360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FUTURES OF CANADA — C$360 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES — C$216 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASC CANADA — C$180 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBnai Zion Charity Fund — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rayjo Charitable TrustON22.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Estaron Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The Amayn Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · My Charity Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Gra Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 847079415:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Marble Arch’s filings →