Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The Macmillan Family Foundation
To provide charitable donations to qualified canadian charities
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$95k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$225k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SAMARA CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY | C$225,000 |
| PEOPLE FOR EDUCATION | C$30,000 |
| TORONTO FOUNDATION | C$25,000 |
| THE TORONTO LIBRARY FOUNDATION | C$20,000 |
| STRONG MINDS STRONG KIDS | C$10,000 |
| PEN CANADA | C$10,000 |
| THE NATIONAL BALLET OF CANADA | C$5,000 |
| PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL | C$5,000 |
| MASSEY COLLEGE | C$3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$65k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TSThe Samara Project8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.0M · revenue -8% · 60% of their budget
- MCMASSEY COLLEGE4× · 2017–2024 · C$353k · revenue +18%
- CFChallenge for Change C4C2× · 2017–2018 · C$300k · revenue -98% · 95% of their budget
Funded once
- UOUniversity of King's Collegegraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$200k · revenue +41%
- OBOUTWARD BOUNDone grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue -21%
- BSBiship Strachan Schoolone grant, 2017 · C$50k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Walrus Foundation publishes independent fact-based journalism fiction and art in The Walrus magazine and at thewalrus.ca. The Walrus stories present a variety of perspectives on the most complex issues of our time focusing on six key…
The Banff Forum's objective is to advance education by hosting an annual forum and events across the country that bring together emerging and established leaders across all sectors and regions to enhance their leadership skills and support…
The foundation encourages research reflection and action in areas important to canadians. the foundation works through four programs: doctoral scholarships fellowships mentorships and public engagement events and conferences.
The Canada Council for the Arts contributes to the vibrancy of a creative and diverse arts and literary scene and supports its presence across Canada and around the world. The Council is Canada’s public arts funder with a mandate to…
The canada west foundation is an independent non-partisan public policy think tank that focuses on the policies that shape the west and by extension canada. through our evidence-based research and commentary we provide practical solutions…
The festival operating under the trade name Luminato presents an annual multi-disciplinary arts festival in Toronto each June. We present both free and ticketed events in theatre classical and contemporary music dance and visual arts by…
C The Visual Arts Foundation is a non-profit charitable organization established to present ideas advance education and document contemporary visual art and artist culture. Our main activity is publishing C Magazine an international art…
We deepen public understanding of a selection of intellectual topics in sport and educate the public about them.
The Siminovitch Prize Foundation celebrates inspires convenes and connects theatre artists on a national stage across disciplines geography and language groups. Its portfolio of programs helps groundbreaking artists thrive creatively and…
Congress for the Humanities and Social Sciences: We organize Canada’s largest annual academic gathering for thousands of researchers graduate students policymakers and members of the public converge to exchange knowledge and engage in…
CIFAR’s research programs are at the heart of its operations designed to push the boundaries of knowledge and create long-term societal impact. Currently CIFAR supports 15 research programs across diverse fields from artificial…
Columbia foundation gifts qualified donees who carry out programs that invest in human and social capital for all canadians: 1. programs undertaken in education training and research and democracy 2. conducting innovative social research…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Women's Foundation / Fondation Canadienne Des Femmes and the most unlike its peers is Biglake Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Samara Project ↗
- Who funds MASSEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Challenge for Change C4C ↗
- Who funds University of King's College ↗
- Who funds ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds OUTWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds Community Food Centres of Canada ↗
- Who funds Biship Strachan School ↗
- Who funds BISHOP STRAGHAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEN CANADA ↗
- Who funds TORONTO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canadian Women's Foundation ↗
- Who funds BIGLAKE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE TORONTO LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ↗
- Who funds JOURNALISTS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds JUR-ED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRONG MINDS STRONG KIDS ↗
- Who funds PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds DANFORTH JEWISH CIRCLE ↗
- Who funds CIVIX ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL BALLET OF CANADA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Makeway Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Bay Tree Foundation · The J W McConnell Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille J W McConnell · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · Bealight Foundation · The George Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation · Jackman Foundation · Hamilton Community Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Private Giving Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.