Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Les and Minda Feldman Charitable Foundation

Donations to charitable organizations and other qualified donees.

C$39k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$38k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$1k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$38k
C$37,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH APPEARLC$37,500
UNITED WAYC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$215k · 4 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

C$215k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$190k · revenue +88%
  • BS
    BETH SHOLOM SYNAGOGUE
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$15k · revenue +69%
  • LB
    LISA BROWN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$5k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SA
    Save A Child's Heart Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue -70%
  • BT
    BETH TZEDEC CONGREGATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$4k · revenue +34%
  • OF
    ONE FAMILY FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +219%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO — C$190,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETH SHOLOM SYNAGOGUE — C$14,990 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSave A Child's Heart Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY — C$5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLISA BROWN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$4,800 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBETH TZEDEC CONGREGATION — C$4,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE FAMILY FUND — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-04-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2023) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 898231493:2022-04-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Les and Minda Feldman’s filings →