Killarney, MB · Public foundation
The Killarney Foundation Inc.
Maintained and promoted the quality of life in the killarney area by way of rendering financial assistance in support of our promotion of various charitable community organizations and granting of scholarships to various educational organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k19 grants · C$38k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$52k
- C$50k–250k3 grants · C$360k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRAIRIE MOUNTAIN RHA | C$150,049 |
| MUNICIPALITY OF KILLARNEY-TURTLE MOUNTAIN | C$114,498 |
| STARS | C$95,801 |
| VARIOUS SCHOLARSHIPS FOR STUDENTS ATTENDING SOUTHERN MANITOB | C$16,250 |
| BRANDON UNIVERSITY | C$13,125 |
| MUNICIPALITY OF HARRISON PARK | C$12,300 |
| ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BRANCH NO.25 | C$10,637 |
| ASSINIBOINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | C$6,000 |
| SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY OPTIONS INC. | C$4,818 |
| KILLARNEY UNITED CHURCH | C$3,904 |
| MUNICIPALITY OF CLANWILLIAM-ERICKSON | C$3,617 |
| HOLY TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH | C$3,572 |
| KIDDIE KORNER EARLY LEARNING CENTRE INC. | C$3,300 |
| KEITH HEMING SCHOLARSHIP FUND | C$3,000 |
| WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$115k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MOMunicipality of Killarney-Turtle Mountain7× · 2017–2024 · C$582k
- IGIndividual grant recipient6× · 2017–2022 · C$490k
- PMPRAIRIE MOUNTAIN RHA2× · 2023–2024 · C$306k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- MOMUNICIPAL OF KILLARNEY-TURTLE MAOUNTAINone grant, 2022 · C$213k
- VSVarious Scholarships For Students Attending Southern Mani...one grant, 2018 · C$42k
- VSVARIOUS SCHOLARSHIPS FOR STUDENTS ATTENDING SOUTHERNone grant, 2022 · C$32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operates a multi site hospital mental health services and long term care residence
Scholarships and the promotion of agricultural focussed post secondary education
Provide primary healthcare (patient emergency surgical outpatient) in a community hospital
Per Prior Year
Operations of daly house museum
University - Post Secondary Education and Research
Backcountry infrastructure improvements and trail maintenance. support to the park for education astronomy programs and infrastructure to protect the dark sky preserve.
Provision of inpatient and outpatient healthcare services for the region.
Carman memorial hospital - equipment boyne valley hostel corp (boyne lodge) #897837027rr0001 bursaries
The hornepayne community hospital is a fully accredited 20 bed facility. 12 long-term care and 8 acute care beds.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prairie Mountain Health and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Community Options Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Virden Area Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.