Skip to content

Dundas, ON · Private foundation

The Juravinski Foundation

Funding is provided to qualified donee during the year.

C$5.1M
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$1.7M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,700,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONC$1,700,000
MCMASTER UNIVERSITYC$1,700,000
HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATIONC$1,700,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$27M · 8 repeat orgsC$500 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

C$27M
C$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+454%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$10M · revenue +18%
  • HH
    HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$7.2M · revenue +85%
  • MU
    MCMASTER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$7.2M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • BB
    BODY BRAVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue +454%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hamilton Health Sciences Research Organization

The Institute's purpose is to solicit receive manage and distribute funds in respect of the advancement of health science research and education and the improvement of patient care in support of legislated and strategic priorities of…

—
2
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation ('HHSC') is a family of five hospital sites and five specialized facilities in Hamilton and West Niagara. HHSC operates McMaster Children's Hospital Hamilton General Hospital Juravinski Hospital and…

—
3
Hamilton Health Sciences Volunteer Association

1. Purchase of hospital equipment for Hamilton Health Sciences (HHS) 2. Fund therapy and recreation programs for patients at HHS 3. Provide amenities for patients at HHS such as furnishing/refurbishing lounges and waiting areas and provide…

—
4
Erie Shores Health Foundation

Erie shores health foundation raises capital for new equipment and building infrastructure for erie shores healthcare; capital campaigns currently being supported include diagnostic imaging mri equipment and urology. erie shores health…

—
5
North Bay Regional Health Centre Foundation

Primary goal is to provide funds for patient-focused care education and research for the benefit of the patients of Nipissing region of Northeastern Ontario. Encourage and administer donations to enhance and improve the services to the…

—
6
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
7
South Huron Hospital Foundation

Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital

—
8
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Operation of a public teaching hospital. provides approximately 804 beds for acute mental health rehabilitation and chronic beds; affiliated with research and various colleges and universities.

—
9
Joseph Brant Hospital Foundation

The Joseph Brant Hospital Foundation solicits maintains and grants funds to enhance and/or improve the facilities and services of the Joseph Brant Hospital.

—
10
The Milton District Hospital Foundation

Donates funds and equipment to halton healthcare services corporation to benefit the milton hospital site.

—
11
The Ottawa Hospital Foundation

The ottawa hospital foundation raises and grants funds to the ottawa hospital foundation and the ottawa hospital research institute and other qaulified donees for the purposes of improving patient care capital dvelopment medical research…

—
12
Toronto East Health Network Foundation

Michael Garron Hospital Foundation raises funds and engages our community in support of Michael Garron Hospital a vibrant community teaching hospital serving more than 400 000 people in 22 distinct neighbourhoods in East Toronto. With…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Joseph's Healthcare Foundation Hamilton and the most unlike its peers is Body Brave Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — C$10,215,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetHAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION — C$7,202,500 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetMCMASTER UNIVERSITY — C$7,200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S VILLA FOUNDATION — C$2,275,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetEVA ROTHWELL CENTRE — C$120,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetHURON SHORES HOSPICE — C$20,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HAMILTON/BURLINGTON SPCA — C$16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN HORSE RACING HALL OF FAME — C$4,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBODY BRAVE INC — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton Community FoundationON7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton Community Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 827708314:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Juravinski’s filings →