Skip to content
Canadian charities

Kitchener, ON · Private foundation

The Jubilee Charitable Trust

Since 2007 The Jubilee Charitable Trust has been supporting the charitable activities of the KEDHAP Foundation in Kenya.

C$575k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$539k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$36k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$539k
C$539,416
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$552k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Link Charity Canada Inc.C$539,416
Missionary Ventures CanadaC$36,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$481k · 3 repeat orgsC$593k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$481k
C$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-25%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$539k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mennonite Central Committee Ontario
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$247k · revenue +32%
  • DI
    DevXchange International Programs
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$127k · revenue +39%
  • MV
    Missionary Ventures Canada
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$108k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • CC
    Cornerstone Community church (Niagara)graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$37k · revenue +80%
  • BI
    Be in Christ Church of Canada
    one grant, 2020 · C$12k · revenue -61%
  • MC
    Mennonite Church of Eastern Canadda
    one grant, 2019 · C$5k · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLink Charity Canada Inc. — C$539,416 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMennonite Central Committee Ontario — C$246,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDevXchange International Programs — C$126,670 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetMissionary Ventures Canada — C$108,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetCornerstone Community church (Niagara) — C$37,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBe in Christ Church of Canada — C$11,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMennonite Church of Eastern Canadda — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Imp…My Tribute Gift Found…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-02-28, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 889391793:2022-02-28 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jubilee’s filings →