Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Joseph Parshan Charitable Foundation

The purpose is to support educational programs private studies and lectures promote archive

C$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$579
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
C$50
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$505
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$20,000
CHAABAD LUBAVITCHC$379
MIFAL KLITAC$50
MESIVTA LUBAVITCHC$50
BIKUR CHOLIMC$50
TORONTO COMMUNITY MIKVAHC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$181k · 22 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
29

Total granted

C$181k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+1%

Still filing today

86%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$50 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MK
    MIFAL KLITA
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$36k · revenue +99%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$20k · revenue +423%
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BC
    Bikur Cholim
    one grant, 2017 · C$460
  • TH
    TZIVOS HASHEM
    one grant, 2023 · C$180 · revenue -38%
  • YD
    Yeshivas Darchei Torah
    one grant, 2017 · C$150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
2
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
5
Or Chadash

Scholarships were granted to qualified students wh desired to continue their education. our agent in isreal rabbi '...' must approve all scholarship applications to ensure that the students qualify for financial assisstance due to faily…

—
6
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
7
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
8
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
9
Torah Schools for Israel

To provide scholarships to deserving students to enable them to study the bible and other jewish courses to subsidize bus transportation for needy students to pay for tutors to provide supplemental hours of education and ensure the…

—
10
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
11
Kolel Yeshivat Kehilat Jacob

To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york

—
12
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Ohr Temimim Lubavitch and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
29/44
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKH Meoroth — C$112,234 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIFAL KLITA — C$36,400 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$20,154 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH — C$3,845 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$908 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMesivta Lubavitch Toronto — C$636 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAT RAMBAN (CANADA) — C$600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS — C$500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA LUBAVITCH — C$480 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$470 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva B'Nei Zion of Toronto — C$454 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHatzoloh Toronto — C$436 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmunah Women of Toronto — C$371 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHachnosas Kallah — C$350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCan Friends of Yad Lachim — C$270 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTalmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah — C$250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetShaarei Tefilah — C$200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Vaad Harabbanim — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECHO — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTZIVOS HASHEM — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH UMESORAH CANADA — C$150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetToronto Eruv Corporation — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Avaraham Yoseph of Toronto — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Joseph Chabad — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Yad Eliezer — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRTFO — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacs Toronto — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOL — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWS OF JUDAISM — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJLIC CANADANHILL — C$54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAYLA'S CHILDREN CENTRE — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOC CHEVRA OSEH CHESED — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhel Sarah Canada — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMALL WONDERS — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESITAH OHR TEMMIIM — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO COMMUNITY MIKVAH — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEH MENCHEN — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMS Society of Canada — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEDER CHABAD — C$18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION CANADA — C$18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Binyomin Char…Rayjo Charitable TrustFieldgate Cares Found…Heitner Charitable Fo…The Friedberg Charita…Jewish Foundation of …Mae Day FoundationJack and Doris Bistri…My Charity FundMoral Arc FoundationThe F&R Hauer Charita…Shainhouse Family Cha…
Zichron Binyomin Charity FoundationON25.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Mae Day Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Shainhouse Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-07-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing education.

Source object 119239903:2024-07-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Joseph Parshan’s filings →