North York, ON · Private foundation
The Joseph and Fanny Tanenbaum Charitable Foundation
The foundation makes charitable contributions to other registered charities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE JOSEPH TANENBAUM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | C$1,200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA3× · 2019–2021 · C$159k · revenue +423%
- TJTHE JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · C$80k · revenue +116%
- YYYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH3× · 2018–2021 · C$67k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- BOBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2018 · C$473k
- OCOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$321k · revenue +31%
- JLJEWISH LEGACY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$212k · revenue +200%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Support of jewish education and institutions
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
To establish maintain and support a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the jewish faith and to provide financial assictance in the form of bursaries and scholarships to students to assist in the costs of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Kids Help Phone/Jeunesse J'ecoute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHR SOMAYACH INSTITUE ↗
- Who funds THE JOSEPH TANENBAUM ↗
- Who funds BETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds OHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH LEGACY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL OHR YOSEF ↗
- Who funds BROTHERS OF MERCY ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL AVRECHIM ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KIRYAS BUNOS ↗
- Who funds BNAI AKIVA SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CARIBOU TORAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
- Who funds EITZ CHAIM SCHOOL OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU ↗
- Who funds THE TORONTO CHEDER ↗
- Who funds MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CHESED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOREST HILL JEWISH CENTRE ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CARE FUND ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MIR YESHIVAS YE ↗
- Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds N.C.S.Y ↗
- Who funds CFO KOLLEL TIFERES YITZCHOK OF ALEKSANDER ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SERVICES AND COMMUNAL MATTERS FUND ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL AVRECHIN ↗
- Who funds KEREN ONTARIO ↗
- Who funds AISH HA TORAH ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL ↗
- Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA KESER TORAH ↗
- Who funds SHAAREI ZION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Gross Family Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.