Skip to content
Canadian charities

North York, ON · Private foundation

The Jb Herzog Charitable Trust

The trust is intended to operate as a private charitable trust whose purpose is primarily to make donations in an orderly fashion to qualified donees.

C$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$27k
  • C$10k–50k9 grants · C$239k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$1.6M
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$1,273,975
KDY INSTITUTEC$287,487
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF BETH JOSEPH ZVIC$49,312
MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADAC$34,729
MAHARAM TAV FUNDC$34,245
SHOMRAI CHABOTH-CHEVRAH MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATIONC$32,540
TORONTO CARE FUNDC$25,000
YESHIVAS UESODEI HATORAC$19,800
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$18,849
NE'EMAN FOUNDATION CANADAC$14,382
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLSC$10,000
CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE SOCIETY OF CANADAC$5,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAHC$5,000
KAV SHALOM KHMC$4,190
MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$4,109
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.5M · 4 repeat orgsC$226k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

C$2.5M
C$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+212%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$213k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$1.5M · revenue +11%
  • KI
    KDY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$837k
  • MO
    MIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$48k · revenue -11%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$14k · revenue +212%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
2
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
7
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
8
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
9
The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization

To establish maintain and support a house of worship with services conducted in accordance with the jewish faith and to provide financial assictance in the form of bursaries and scholarships to students to assist in the costs of…

—
10
Friends of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah

Initiatives that advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with the jewish faith

—
11
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
12
Zolty Charitable Foundation

Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Kdy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
3/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$1,545,190 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF BETH JOSEPH ZVI — C$49,312 over 1y, 69% of budgetMIZRACHI ORGANIZATION OF CANADA — C$48,229 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$34,245 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHOMRAI CHABOTH-CHEVRAH MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$32,540 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTORONTO CARE FUND — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$23,709 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS UESODEI HATORA — C$19,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNE'EMAN FOUNDATION CANADA — C$14,382 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY — C$13,500 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetKAV SHALOM KHM — C$4,190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$4,109 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISHKAN AVRAHAM — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SHUL AND LEARNING CENTER OF TORONTO — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOME CARE SERVICES ( TORONTO) — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION KAHAL AVREICHIM — C$800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD OF MISSISSAUGA — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fieldgate Cares Found…My Charity FundSilver Family Charita…The F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…Jewish Foundation of …Rayjo Charitable TrustThe Gross Family Foun…Jack and Doris Bistri…The Friedberg Charita…Moral Arc FoundationZichron Binyomin Char…
Fieldgate Cares FoundationON13.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fieldgate Cares Foundation · My Charity Fund · Silver Family Charitable Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Gross Family Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 702359902:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jb Herzog’s filings →