Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The Israel Goldgrub Charitable Foundation
To make gifts to or disbursements to qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LODZER CENTRE CONGREGATION | C$55,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LCLODZER CENTRE CONGREGATION6× · 2018–2024 · C$335k · revenue +38% · 48% of their budget
- UFUJA FEDERATION6× · 2018–2024 · C$60k · revenue +88%
- CFCANADIAN FRIENDS SHALVA3× · 2019–2021 · C$21k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- UJUJA JEWISH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue +87%
- IWI.D.F. WIDOWS 7 ORPHANS ORG.graduatedone grant, 2019 · C$10k · revenue ×11
- TKTHE KELMAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Israel Magen Fund of Canada is to identify and support projects for qualified institutions in Israel and globally that require humanitarian aid medical assistance and physical and mental health care.
To provide funds to aid the cause of cancer research in canada and israel.
To provide assistance to those in need
The organization runs a variety of programming benefiting children and families within israel who are at risk of food or socioeconomic vulnerability.
The israel cancer research fund (toronto) provides funds to aid in the research of cancer in all phases: causes detection diagnosis treatment cure and care.
Poverty relief and financial assistance to the poor in israel
Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.
To assist and supply needy jewish residents in Israel and/or deserving students
To provide support to rambam medical centre haifa israel.
Fund raising in toronto promoting understanding of the holocaust and world war ii to fund the institute for study of the holocaust in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Israel Appeal of Canada Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lodzer Centre Congregation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LODZER CENTRE CONGREGATION ↗
- Who funds UJA FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS SHALVA ↗
- Who funds One Family ↗
- Who funds UJA JEWISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds I.D.F. WIDOWS 7 ORPHANS ORG. ↗
- Who funds THE KELMAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAT MELECH CANADA ↗
- Who funds UNITED ISRAEL APPEAL OF CANADA INC. ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIEDNS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · My Charity Fund · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.