Skip to content

Thornhill, ON · Charitable organization

The Institute of Torah Education

The Institute of Torah Education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

C$212k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$96k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$33k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$25k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$155k
C$7,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$96,135
THORNHILL JEWISH FUNDC$58,750
THE TORONTO CHEDERC$14,459
BAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILLC$10,300
ACHIM TORONTOC$7,280
MAAYANOS TORAHC$7,000
BNOS BAIS YAAKOVC$7,000
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$4,800
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$2,000
YESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVIC$2,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHUC$1,500
BETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATIONC$533
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLSC$360
NER ISRAEL-JOSEPH (J.T.) TANEBAUM YESHIVAH COLLEGE OF TORONC$250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.2M · 19 repeat orgsC$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

C$1.2M
C$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+19%

Still filing today

95%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$518k · revenue +423%
  • OC
    OHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$237k · revenue +222%
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$75k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARYAH AND FAIGE LEBOVIC CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue -76%
  • DO
    DHEVRA OSEH CHESED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ORGANIZATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +11%
  • KT
    K'HAL TORAS CHESEDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue +205%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
2
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
3
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
6
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
7
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
8
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
9
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
12
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is Ruchama Fraidel Relief Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$517,758 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$237,010 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$75,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$74,959 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHORNHILL JEWISH FUND — C$73,961 over 2y, 25% of budgetC.F.O. YESHIVAS NOVOMINSK — C$55,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetBNEI TORAH CHARITY FUND — C$40,450 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$34,650 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARYAH AND FAIGE LEBOVIC CHARITABLE TRUST — C$25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV — C$21,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$19,850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL — C$19,300 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$13,555 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACHIM TORONTO — C$12,926 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETH JOCOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$10,350 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBETH AVRAHAM YOSEPH OF TORONTO CONGREGATION — C$7,793 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAAYANOS TORAH — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDHEVRA OSEH CHESED FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ORGANIZATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetK'HAL TORAS CHESED — C$4,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAIS HATAVSHIL & HACHNOSAS ORCHIM — C$3,865 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABOTH CHEVRAH MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$3,360 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOREST HILL JEWISH CENTRE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHORNHILL TORAH EDUCATIONAL CENTRE — C$2,160 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAS NACHALAS ZVI — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAISH HATORAH — C$700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUCHAMA FRAIDEL RELIEF ORGANIZATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNER ISRAEL - JOSEPH (J.T.) TANENBAUM YESHIVAH COLLEGE OF TOR — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES (KOLLEL AVREICHIM TORO — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Binyomin Charity FoundationON17.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · The Jewish Legacy Charitable Foundation · The Rothschild Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 829965524:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Institute of Torah Education’s filings →