Skip to content
Canadian charities

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Herbert Green Family Charitable Foundation Inc.

Donations

C$224k
Granted FY2017
26
Grants FY2017
2
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under C$10k21 grants · C$64k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$60k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$100k
C$4,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gates of Mercy FoundationC$50,000
Durham CollegeC$50,000
Beth Oloth Charitable OrganizationC$35,000
Canadian Friends of Aish HatorahC$15,000
Canadian Friends of Yad EllezerC$10,000
Mizrachi Organization of CanadaC$8,000
Beth Oloth Charitable OrganizationC$7,999
Canadian Friends of NevaC$5,000
Mizrachi Organization of CanadaC$5,000
Beth Oloth Charitable OrganizationC$5,000
Mizrachi Organization of CanadaC$5,000
Jewish National Fund of CanadaC$5,000
B'nai TzionC$4,000
Kehilla Residential ProgrammeC$3,000
Beth Oloth Charitable OrganizationC$3,000
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
2
The Canadian Friends of Mercaz Hatorah

Funds provided for students desirous of studying advanced Talmudic and Torah law at Mercaz Hatorah Rabbinical Seminary in Jerusalem and other similar institutions.

—
3
Canadian Friends of Mesivta Torah Temimah

Provide scholarsheps and assistance to deserving students to continue their studies at mesivta torah temimah.

—
4
Canadian Friends of Yeshiva Beth Hillel Bnai Brak

Scholarships granted to qualified applicants related to post-graduate studies

—
5
Canadian Friends of Yeshivat Wiznitz of Bnei Braq

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at yeshivat wiznitz.

—
6
Jewish Poverty Relief Program
—
7
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
8
Canadian Friends of Yeshiva Lomza

Provide scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to follow religious courses given at lomza yeshiva in israel.

—
9
Canadian Friends of Lelov

Provide scholarships and financial assistance to deserving students studying at lelov yeshiva.

—
10
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—
11
Canadian Friends of Mesivta Torah V'yirah of U T a

Provide scholarships and assistance to needy students

—
12
Canadian Friends of Beth Joseph Zvi

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to follow religious courses.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ne'eman Foundation Canada and the most unlike its peers is Kehilla Residential Programme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMizrachi Organization of Canada — C$11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanadian Friends of Yad Ellezer — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJewish National Fund of Canada — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Neva — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBeth Oloth Charitable Organization — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKehilla Residential Programme — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMishmeret — C$2,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetThe Neeman Foundation — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Family Overcoming Terror Together — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Aryah and Faige L…
The Aryah and Faige Lebovic Charitable TrustON8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Aryah and Faige Lebovic Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2017-10-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2017. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2018) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 119237444:2017-10-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Herbert Green Family’s filings →