Toronto, ON · Private foundation
The Harry and Max Korolnek Family Foundation
The foundation provides charitable donations to the needy and to registered charities of qualified donees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM SYNAGOGUE | C$605 |
| CONGREGATION SHOMRIM LABOKER | C$540 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +110% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CTCONGREGASTION TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM4× · 2019–2023 · C$6k · revenue +2%
- CWCHABAD WESTMOUNT2× · 2020–2021 · C$2k · revenue +672%
- RCRABINNICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA2× · 2020–2021 · C$1k · revenue +110%
Funded once
- ASAGUDA SOUTHone grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue -2%
- TETORAH EMETHone grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue -44%
- ECEITZ CHAIMone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of jewish education and institutions
Offers scholarships to needy students of rabbinical seminaries publications of religious periodicals and enhancing Jewish culture and heritage.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
Jewish education
To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Torath Emeth Jewish Centre and the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer Society of Canada - Societe Alzheimer Du Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONGREGASTION TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION SHOMRIM LABOKER ↗
- Who funds AGUDA SOUTH ↗
- Who funds TORAH EMETH ↗
- Who funds CHABAD WESTMOUNT ↗
- Who funds EITZ CHAIM ↗
- Who funds RABINNICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds JACS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION CJA ↗
- Who funds CDN OF BETH HATALMUD ↗
- Who funds CFO KOLLEL TIFERES ↗
- Who funds RFRO ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds EZER MITZION ↗
- Who funds CJCS CENTRE (CUMMINGS JEWISH CENTRE FOR SENIORS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VMM ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds BNAI ZION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · La Fondation Lcs / the Lcs Foundation · Dubrofsky Foundation / · The Aryah and Faige Lebovic Charitable Trust · Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · The Friedberg Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.