Skip to content

Edmonton, AB · Charitable organization

The Governors of the University of Alberta

The University of Alberta operates under the Post-Secondary Learning Act of the Province of Alberta to provide post-secondary and graduate education and to engage in research and public service.

C$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
68
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$970k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$111k
  • C$10k–50k40 grants · C$822k
  • C$50k–250k8 grants · C$572k
  • C$250k+3 grants · C$2.0M
C$15,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$6.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Graduate Students AssociationC$970,000
Individual grant recipientC$777,000
Wajax LimitedC$277,000
Regents of the University of MinnesotaC$123,000
Coanda Research & Development CorpC$85,000
IndspireC$84,000
Alberta Law Reform InstituteC$60,000
Canada Homestay Network SocietyC$59,000
Sea to Sky Meeting Management IncC$56,000
Maternal Infant Child & YouthC$55,000
JDC West Business Competition IncC$50,000
Individual grant recipientC$43,000
Individual grant recipientC$40,000
Migrante Alberta AssociationC$39,000
OKAKI Health Intelligence IncC$38,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 16% of grant dollars (C$1.3M). The 84% that went abroad (C$6.8M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 84% of all-years giving (C$6.8M)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$215k · 6 grants
GBC$74k · 2 grants
PolandC$52k · 3 grants
FranceC$50k · 2 grants
UAC$41k · 4 grants
ItalyC$7k · 1 grant
ArgentinaC$6k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$5.9M · 32 repeat orgsC$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
43

Total granted

C$5.9M
C$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+2%

Still filing today

13%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • I
    Indspire
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$798k · revenue +76%
  • AC
    Augustana Chaplaincy Council
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$132k · revenue +2% · 29% of their budget
  • CF
    Campus Food Bank Society
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$14k · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • I
    Indspire
    one grant, 2022 · C$296k
  • TC
    Tulsa Combustion LLC
    one grant, 2023 · C$88k
  • KA
    Kemet Advanced Manufacturing Ltd
    one grant, 2023 · C$73k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Calgary Construction Association Education Fund

Awarded scholarships

—
2
Friends of the University of Alberta

Fund Student Scholarships and Awards Sponsor public lectures featuring University Speakers Financially support university programs to engage the broader community

—
3
Canadian Federation of University Women-Edmonton Academic

Provide financial assistance to female students attending the university of alberta. see above

—
4
The Calgary Foundation

The Calgary Foundation carried out its charitable purpose through the ongoing administration of its granting programs. While the Foundation provides grants to support charitable activity across the entire sector it has a particular focus…

—
5
Canadian Association of University Teachers Foundation Fond ation de l'association Canadienne des professeures et professeurs d'université
—
6
Students' Involvement Endowment Foundation

Promote the advancement of education by the provision of scholarships bursaries or other financial assistance for students of merits and distinction at the university of alberta -to contribute funds to projects that will benefit students…

—
7
University Hospitals Foundation

The University Hospital Foundation raises funds to advance the position of the community and academic medical centre including the University of Alberta Hospital Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and the Kaye Edmonton Clinic as centers…

—
8
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
9
The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology Foundation

The NAIT Foundation raises funds to support the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology. Funds are used for: -scholarships and bursaries granted to NAIT students -operational costs capital equipment needs in support of NAIT's educational…

—
10
World Literacy Foundation Canada

Supporting university of calgary books to build on fund providing books for indigenous students.

—
11
The Governors of the University of Alberta

The University of Alberta operates under the Post-Secondary Learning Act of the Province of Alberta to provide post-secondary and graduate education and to engage in research and public service. The university has approximately 40 061…

—
12
Canadian Federation of Univerity Women Cambridge Scholarshipfund

Scholarship for women attending university / community college scholarship for women in literacy programs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Alberta Capital Region and the most unlike its peers is Johann Strauss Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIndspire — C$798,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAugustana Chaplaincy Council — C$131,775 over 5y, 29% of budgetCanada Ukraine Foundation — C$26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWE Charity (formerly Free the Children) — C$20,529 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCampus Food Bank Society — C$14,008 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEdmonton Community Legal Centre — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJohann Strauss Foundation — C$3,780 over 1y, 12% of budgetCanadian Engineering Memorial Foundation — C$3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe United Way — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$1,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indspire ↗
  • Who funds Augustana Chaplaincy Council ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance CanadaON5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 108102831:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Governors of the University of Alberta’s filings →