Oakville, ON · Private foundation
The Golden Rule Charitable Foundation
Provide financial assistance to qualified donees engaged in worthy charitable activities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S AID FOUNDATION | C$120,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 39% of grant dollars (C$370k). The 61% that went abroad (C$580k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 61% of all-years giving (C$580k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2022 · C$580k
- CACHILDREN'S AID FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · C$215k · revenue +41%
- CCCHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S FUND OF CANADA3× · 2017–2019 · C$60k · revenue -2%
Funded once
- SKSICK KIDS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$50k · revenue +6%
- SHSCARBOROUGH HEALTH NETWORKone grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.