London, ON · Charitable organization
The Gathering Place and Revival Centre
Weekly church services at the house of worship the children's sunday school and nursery care.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Refuge Ministries of Canada | C$780 |
| Steve Felming Ministries | C$700 |
| Life Spin | C$500 |
| Canada Helps | C$10 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$510 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MNMinisters Network Canada2× · 2019–2021 · C$4k · revenue +40%
- RMREFUGE MINISTRIES CANADA5× · 2017–2022 · C$2k · revenue +155%
- CCCOMPASSION CANADA3× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- HTHEART TO HEART FAMILY MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +67%
- WLWINDSOR LIFE CENTERone grant, 2019 · C$800 · revenue +10%
- IAIMPACT ASIA MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · C$699 · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
Monthly conference calls Workshops YouTube teachings Mentoring leaders Prayer sessions
Assisting the local church in canada and asia by providing literature information and training.
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
Provide leadership conferences training and church planting support in developing countries. Also to provide spiritual life and evangelism conferences in Canada as well as in first nations church community
Equipping the church to uphold the accuracy and authority of the bible to enable the church to more effectively present the gospel in an increasingly secular and evoluntionary society. the organization promotes the cause of creation in…
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Christian Missions funding to advance the Christian Gospel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ministers Network Canada and the most unlike its peers is Ark Aid Street Mission Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHY CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds Ministers Network Canada ↗
- Who funds REFUGE MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION CANADA ↗
- Who funds Steve Fleming Minstries ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Ark Aid Street Mission Inc. ↗
- Who funds WINDSOR LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds IMPACT ASIA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HEART & STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canada Helps ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rick4Can Ministries · Windsor Christian Fellowship · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.