Skip to content

Markham, ON · Public foundation

The Frank Scarpitti Charitable Foundation Inc.

Student grants for post secondary education donations/grants to various organizations in the community

C$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$6k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$100k
C$100,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$100,000
BETH CHABAD ISRAELI COMMUNITYC$5,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$606k · 8 repeat orgsC$326k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +150% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

C$606k
C$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+150%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$300k · revenue +150%
  • MF
    MARKHAM FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$93k · revenue ×21
  • YB
    YELLOW BRICK HOUSE
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$85k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • MS
    MARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$50k · revenue +41%
  • CI
    CHERISH INTEGRATED SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$35k · revenue +212%
  • TF
    TORONTO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$30k · revenue +133%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
2
Unionville Home Society Foundation

To support the operations of a long-term care home and community support services for the elderly in the City of Markham through Unionville Home Society. To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply from time to time all or part…

—
3
Toronto East Health Network Foundation

Michael Garron Hospital Foundation raises funds and engages our community in support of Michael Garron Hospital a vibrant community teaching hospital serving more than 400 000 people in 22 distinct neighbourhoods in East Toronto. With…

—
4
Sinai Health Giving Fund
—
5
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Foundation

The toronto rehabilitation institute foundation's mission is to raise grant and steward funds to support the mission of the toronto rehabilitation institute (which is part of the university health network) to develop solutions for people…

—
6
Casey House Foundation

Casey House Foundation raises funds to support exemplary health care and compassionate support at Casey House a hospital unlike any other. As a sub-acute specialty hospital in Toronto they offer comprehensive inpatient and outpatient…

—
7
Sinai Health Foundation

Sinai hospital foundation provides financial support to sinai health system (shs) - which includes mount sinai hospital hennick bridgepoint hospital lunenfeld-tanenbaum research institute and system partner circle of care - for patient…

—
8
Mount Sinai Hospital Employees' Charity Trust

Donations to united way of greater toronto united jewish appeal of greater toronto and sinai health foundation.

—
9
York Care Foundation Inc.

York foundation inc acts to support york manor inc (york care center) in the continual improvement in quality of living for the residents of the center by receiving managing and raising funds to purchase equipment support care programs…

—
10
North York General Hospital Foundation

North york general hospital foundation raises and stewards funds for north york general hospital to purhase medical and capital improvements and support the hospital program and staff training and education. with the foundation's funding…

—
11
Markdale Hospital Foundation

To recieve and maintain a fund or funds through donations events and bequests for the purposes of local and regional hospital care for the purchase of equipment furniture fixtures and education to support brightshores health system and…

—
12
CityFund Foundation

The Foundation provides funds to qualified donees to further its charitable interests. Examples include: City of Toronto City of Burlington City of Brampton.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hf Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Oak Valley Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$300,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMARKHAM FOOD BANK — C$93,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetYELLOW BRICK HOUSE — C$85,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEVERGREEN HOSPICE — C$56,200 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetMARKHAM STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHERISH INTEGRATED SERVICES — C$35,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetTORONTO FOUNDATION — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH CHABAD ISRAELI COMMUNITY — C$26,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMARKHAM ARTS COUNCIL — C$25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL ST. JUSTIN MARTYR — C$25,000 over 5y, 78% of budgetUNITED WAY GREATER TORONTO — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEE HONG COMMUNITY WELLNESS FOUNDATION — C$25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SALVATION ARMY — C$15,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHONG FOOK MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFREINDS OF SIMON WISENTHAL CENTER — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMACKENZIE HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY LODGE FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCYRUS FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetACROSS U-HUB — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MARKHAVEN FOUNDATION — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING NEWMARKET/AURORA DISTRICT — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID FOUNDATION — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSE OF SHARON — C$5,539 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER TORONTO — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARKHAM ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetST MARY ARMENIAN CHURCH — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

York Catholic District School BoardON8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: York Catholic District School Board · Sing Tao(Canada) Foundation · The Allstate Foundation of Canada · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Canada Gives · BenefAction Foundation · Private Giving Foundation · Toronto Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Abundance Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 890032667:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Frank Scarpitti’s filings →