Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

The Frank Fowler Foundation

The foundation objectives are to fund various charitable purposes

C$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$40k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$70k
C$6,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RIVERWOOD CONSERVANCYC$20,000
MARCH OF DIMES CANADAC$10,000
FOOD BANKS MISSISSAUGAC$10,000
LAKESHORE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTRE INCC$10,000
ERINOAK KIDS CENTRE FOR TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENTC$10,000
COMMUNITY LIVING MISSISSAUGAC$10,000
OUR PLACE PEELC$6,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF PEELC$6,000
LUMENUS COMMUNITY SERVICESC$6,000
ROSA'S CENTREC$6,000
ARMAGHC$6,000
PEEL SENIOR LINKC$5,000
ARTHEART COMMUNITY ART CENTREC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$716k · 16 repeat orgsC$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

C$716k
C$0

Still filing today

94%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RIVERWOOD CONSERVANCY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$106k · revenue +11%
  • EK
    ERINOAK KIDS CENTRE FOR TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$74k · revenue +34%
  • CL
    COMMUNITY LIVING MISSISSAUGA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$66k · revenue +42%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

    03Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Community Living Toronto

    Community Living Toronto provides a variety of innovative supports to children youth and adults with an intellectual disability and their families. Our person-centered services and supports aim to foster natural community networks and…

    —
    2
    Strides Toronto Support Services

    Strides Toronto is a multi-service agency providing services to young people from birth to age 29 and their families in Toronto. Strides Toronto provides a range of community residential and treatment services to improve the mental social…

    —
    3
    Community Living Wallaceburg

    Community Living Wallaceburg's purpose: We co-create design & deliver supports that empower people to overcome barriers and live the life they choose. Community Living Wallaceburg provides meaningful supports and services to individuals…

    —
    4
    Children's Treatment Network of Simcoe York

    Children's Treatment Network (CTN) supports children and youth with disabilities and developmental needs in their homes communities and schools. CTN provides programs and services including intake service navigation coordinated service…

    —
    5
    Canopy Support Services

    Canopy Support Services delivers case management services for adults who have exceptional needs and advocacy services for individuals who have exceptional needs. Provide mediator based training to parents of children with behaviourial…

    —
    6
    New Visions Toronto

    Mission Statement: 'To support connect and advocate for full community inclusion for people with disabilities'. New Visions Toronto provides residential support to children and adults with developmental and/or physical disabilities in…

    —
    7
    Associated Youth Services of Peel

    AYSP strengthens the abilities of adults children youth and their families who are or are at risk of experiencing serious social emotional or behavioral difficulties. Staff and volunteers provide support education counseling or therapy in…

    —
    8
    Bruce Peninsula Association for Community Living

    Provide Support services to individuals and their families with developmental challenges. Services include day programming residential homes employment & community integration case management respite support transportation & housing. Our…

    —
    9
    Let's Grow - Learning and Living Hub

    We are a safe and fun midtown Toronto day program designed specifically for complex developmental and physically disabled adults. We believe each team member is unique and on a path of living and learning. Our community warmly welcomes our…

    —
    10
    Kinsight Community Society

    1) we provide early intervention & family support services to individuals & families of children & youth who are at risk for or have a developmental delay. services include home school & child care visits; group opportunities for support;…

    —
    11
    Independent Living Services Simcoe County

    Independent living services simcoe county is a non-profit organization that works to help support people remain active members of their communities and thrive as independent individuals in their own home. we provide individualized support…

    —
    12
    Peel Cheshire Homes Inc.

    Provides livingand support servicesfor physically disables adults

    —

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Living Mississauga and the most unlike its peers is Innocence Canada Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    02the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

    Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    7
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    15/16
    Grantees still filing
    15/16
    Grew since you first funded

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE RIVERWOOD CONSERVANCY — C$106,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetERINOAK KIDS CENTRE FOR TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENT — C$74,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVING MISSISSAUGA — C$66,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTRE INC — C$56,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD BANKS MISSISSAUGA — C$54,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOUR PLACE PEEL — C$48,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetROSA'S CENTRE — C$48,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF PEEL — C$42,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARMAGH — C$42,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPEEL SENIOR LINK — C$40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARTHEART COMMUNITY ART CENTRE — C$40,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetETOBICOKE CHILDREN'S CENTRE — C$25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINNOCENCE CANADA FOUNDATION — C$20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES CANADA — C$20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES CANADA — C$17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUMENUS COMMUNITY SERVICES — C$17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE RIVERWOOD CONSERVANCY ↗
    • Who funds ERINOAK KIDS CENTRE FOR TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
    • Who funds COMMUNITY LIVING MISSISSAUGA ↗
    • Who funds LAKESHORE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTRE INC ↗
    • Who funds FOOD BANKS MISSISSAUGA ↗
    • Who funds OUR PLACE PEEL ↗
    • Who funds ROSA'S CENTRE ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF PEEL ↗
    • Who funds ARMAGH ↗
    • Who funds PEEL SENIOR LINK ↗
    • Who funds ARTHEART COMMUNITY ART CENTRE ↗
    • Who funds ETOBICOKE CHILDREN'S CENTRE ↗
    • Who funds INNOCENCE CANADA FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES CANADA ↗
    • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES CANADA ↗
    • Who funds LUMENUS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Mississauga FoundationON10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Mississauga Foundation · Ontario Realtors Care Foundation · Marion Ethel Kamm and Frederick John Kamm Charitable Trust · The Harold E. Ballard Foundation · Kids Up Front Foundation (Toronto) · J.P. Bickell Foundation · The McLean Foundation · Youth and Philanthropy Initiative Canada/ Initiative Canada Jeunesse Et Philanthropie · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · Toronto Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

    Source object 879478816:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

    Play a game based on Frank Fowler’s filings →