Skip to content

Cote St.Luc, QC · Private foundation

The Frances and David Rubin Family Foundation Inc.

Universities & colleges Social outreach religious fellowships & auxilliary orgs.

C$115k
Granted FY2018
28
Grants FY2018
2
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under C$10k26 grants · C$46k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$69k
C$2,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tel Aviv UniversityC$35,000
Chevra KadishaC$34,000
Magen David IsraelC$2,500
Schizophrenia SocC$2,000
Mab MackayC$2,000
JGH EldercareC$2,000
Fr Simon WiesenthaC$2,000
Leukemia LymphonaC$2,000
MADA Community CC$2,000
MS SocC$2,000
Cancer ResC$2,000
TouretteC$2,000
AMI QUEC$2,000
JGH FoundationC$2,000
Arthritis SocietyC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$82k · 25 repeat orgsC$37k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

C$82k
C$100

Still filing today

96%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    Chevra Kadisha
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$35k · revenue +1%
  • MD
    Magen David Israel
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +457%
  • MH
    Maimonides Hosp
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CR
    Cancer RES
    one grant, 2017 · C$100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Cancer Research Fund Fondation D'israËL Pour La Recherche Sur Le Cancer

To provide funds to aid the cause of cancer research in canada and israel.

—
2
Fondation de Recherche Medicale Maimonides / Maimonides Medical Research Foundation

The purpose of the maimonides medical research foundation is to solicit and obtain gifts legacies and endowment funds in order to promote research health education and cultural services and to make gifts grants contributions and donations…

—
3
Fondation De L'hopital Mont Sinai / Mount Sinai Hospital Foundation

Providing funds for medical charitable and educational purposes by making gifts grants contributions and donations to or for the benefit of the mont sinai hospital centre montreal

—
4
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
5
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
6
Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation

La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…

—
7
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
8
The Museum of Jewish Montreal

The museum of jewish of montreal is an innovative place to connect with montreal's jewish life and identify share its diverse heritage and create new cultural experiences. the organization's activities include historical walking tours art…

—
9
Israel Magen Fund of Canada

The mission of the Israel Magen Fund of Canada is to identify and support projects for qualified institutions in Israel and globally that require humanitarian aid medical assistance and physical and mental health care.

—
10
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
11
La Corporation du Centre Hospitalier Gériatrique Maimonides/Maimonides Hospital Geriatric Center

Provide the highest quality continuum of health care and social services throughout out network of institution provide compassionate care and services that are centered on the user and create an exceptional user experience develop and…

—
12
Amis Canadiens Du Centre Medical Sheba/Canadian Friends of Sheba Medical Center

Participation in medical research and training activities conducted in canada and israel and purchase of medical equipment for use at the sheba medical center located in israel for purposes of advancing medical innovation and providing…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Societe De L'arthrite Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Segal Centre for Performing Arts / Centre Segal des Arts de la Scène. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTel Aviv University — C$35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetChevra Kadisha — C$35,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMagen David Israel — C$2,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaimonides Hosp — C$2,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMiriam Found — C$2,225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCummings Centre — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCom J Appeal — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJGH Eldercare — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJGH Foundation — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSchizophrenia Soc — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCrohns Colitis — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMI QUE — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMADA Community C — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORT MTL — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFr Simon Wiesentha — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMS Soc — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArthritis Society — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTourette — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMab Mackay — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLeukemia Lymphona — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer — C$2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Res — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ Pub Library — C$1,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaison Shalom — C$1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJGH AUX — C$618 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYMHA — C$60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind GoodmanQC15.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · Nellie Philanthropy Foundation · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Alvin Segal Family Foundation · The Norman Zavalkoff Family Foundation / la Fondation Familiale Norman Zavalkoff · Wcpd Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation.

Source object 889275798:2018-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Frances and David Rubin Family’s filings →