Langley, BC · Charitable organization
The Evangelical Free Church of Canada - Eglise Evangelique Libre de Canada
Encouragement of EFCC Churches across Canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$8k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRAIRIE BIBLE INSTITUTE | C$10,000 |
| TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY | C$4,521 |
| IRANIAN CHURCH OF RICHMOND HILL | C$3,000 |
| GOSPEL ART PRODUCTIONS | C$510 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LPLOWER PACIFIC DISTRICT OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CAN3× · 2017–2019 · C$38k · revenue +81%
- TWTRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY7× · 2017–2024 · C$35k · revenue +60%
- PBPrairie Bible Institute2× · 2023–2024 · C$25k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- PIPARTNERS INTERNATIONALone grant, 2019 · C$25k · revenue +19%
- CPCANADIAN PACIFIC DISTRICT OF THE EFCCone grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue 0%
- APALBERTA PARKLAND DISTRICT OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OFgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$375 · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The entity provides direction guidance and financial assistance as needed to approximately 33 Churches. The superintendent acts also as a pastor to some 33 pastors.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Operate a theological college to educate and equip christians for spirt-empowered ministry.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Bible college for canadian and international students
The BCBC is a family of 35 member & 2 affiliated churches whose purpose is to co-ordinate church planting revitalization and other co-operative ministries in BC. This mission is made possible by the staff at the Langley BC office working…
Short term mission teams traveled from canada to assist national churches in evangelism discipleship and church planting.
Cours de théologie et relation d'aide
Emmanuel bible college is a post secondary institution providing undergraduate ministry education. students are equipped for christian ministry vocations through various programs in biblical general and professional studies.
Through post-secondary education programs columbia bible college equips people for a life of discipleship ministry and leadership in service to the church and community. programs include one-year certificates two-year diplomas and bachelor…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Evangelical Free Church of Canada - Canadian Pacific District and the most unlike its peers is Trinity Western University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOWER PACIFIC DISTRICT OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF CAN ↗
- Who funds TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Prairie Bible Institute ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE IRANIAN CHURCH OF RICHMOND HILL ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL ART PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds GRACE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN PACIFIC DISTRICT OF THE EFCC ↗
- Who funds ALBERTA PARKLAND DISTRICT OF THE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.